{"id":90,"date":"2022-05-20T16:25:22","date_gmt":"2022-05-20T14:25:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/boisenergieweb\/?p=90"},"modified":"2024-09-30T10:24:20","modified_gmt":"2024-09-30T08:24:20","slug":"guides-pratiques-et-syntheses-des-connaissances","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.gip-ecofor.org\/gerboise\/guides-pratiques-et-syntheses-des-connaissances\/","title":{"rendered":"Guides pratiques et synth\u00e8ses des connaissances (BD internationale)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p style=\"font-size:18px\">Une <strong>base de donn\u00e9es bibliographiques<\/strong> concernant la r\u00e9colte des r\u00e9manents est disponible ici. Les r\u00e9f\u00e9rences retenues couvrent\u00a0:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li style=\"font-size:18px\">les guides pratiques fran\u00e7ais, cibl\u00e9s enti\u00e8rement (Guide ADEME 2006) ou partiellement sur la question des r\u00e9manents ;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li style=\"font-size:18px\">les guides pratiques \u00e9trangers individuels (nationaux en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral), et des synth\u00e8ses (anglo-saxonnes principalement) de diff\u00e9rents guides ;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li style=\"font-size:18px\">une s\u00e9lection de r\u00e9f\u00e9rences sur la certification en lien avec la r\u00e9colte de bois pour l\u2019\u00e9nergie ;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li style=\"font-size:18px\">une s\u00e9lection de rapports et d\u2019articles de synth\u00e8ses sur les impacts environnementaux de la r\u00e9colte de bois pour l\u2019\u00e9nergie.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"font-size:18px\">La majorit\u00e9 des ressources concerne la p\u00e9riode 2007-2017.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"font-size:18px\"><strong>Pour identifier un document, utilisez le formulaire suivan<\/strong>t : <\/p>\n\n\n\n<table id=\"tablepress-5\" class=\"tablepress tablepress-id-5\">\n<thead>\n<tr class=\"row-1\">\n\t<th class=\"column-1\">Titre<\/th><th class=\"column-2\">R\u00e9sum\u00e9<\/th><th class=\"column-3\">Auteurs<\/th><th class=\"column-4\">Ann\u00e9e<\/th><th class=\"column-5\">Emprunte g\u00e9ographique<\/th><th class=\"column-6\">Journal \/ \u00e9dition<\/th><th class=\"column-7\">Type<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody class=\"row-striping row-hover\">\n<tr class=\"row-2\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full\/10.1002\/ldr.5045\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\nRestoring soil properties in the Hyrcanian forests from<br \/>\nmachine induced compaction: Reforestation of N2-fixing black alder (Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn.)<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">The effects of reforestation with black alder on the recovery of litter (thickness, C, N,<br \/>\nC\/N) and soil physicochemical, biochemical, biological, and microbial properties in the skid trails with three levels of compactions were examined over a 27-year period. The results clearly showed that black alder is effective in reaching the objectives of restoration programs, given that it promotes soil organic matter,<br \/>\nbuilds up soil structure via root-soil feedback, and improves the soil by creating a major source of nitrogen through enhancing the nitrogen cycle.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Fatemeh Kiumarsi, Meghdad Jourgholami, Mohammad Jafari<br \/>\nAngela Lo Monaco, Rachele Venanzi, Rodolfo Picchio<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2024<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Iran<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Wiley<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-3\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/forestry\/advance-article\/doi\/10.1093\/forestry\/cpae041\/7724962\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\nManaging harvesting residues: a systematic review of<br \/>\nmanagement treatments around the world<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">In this work, we provide a general outline of the role of<br \/>\nresidues as well as a summary of current management options adopted around the world. The intention of the work is to provide an information base for stakeholders including forest managers and policymakers in identifying and assessing potential alternatives for their current local practices.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Alberto Udali, Woodam Chung, Bruce Talbot, Stefano Grigolato<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2024<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">International<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-4\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.biorxiv.org\/content\/10.1101\/2023.03.07.531469v1.abstract\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\nLogging disrupts the ecology of molecules in headwater streams<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\"> Here, we tested how logging changed dissolved organic matter in headwaters of hardwood-dominated catchments in northern Ontario, Canada. We apply a before-after control-impact 19 experiment across four catchments for three years.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Erika C Freeman1, Erik JS Emilson, Kara Webster, Thorsten Dittmar, Andrew J Tanentzap<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2023<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">International<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">bioRxiv<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-5\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full\/10.1111\/1365-2664.14537\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\nVariable shifts in bird and bat assemblages as a result of <br \/>\nreduced-impact logging revealed after 10\u2009years<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Our study demonstrates how best practice forestry and logging can maintain healthy vertebrate populations over the long term.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Arianne E. Harris, Gyanpriya Maharaj, Matthew Hallett, Raquel Thomas, Anand Roopsind, Brian J. O'Shea, Jake E. Bicknell<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2023<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">International<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Journal of Applied Ecology<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-6\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s40725-023-00198-x\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\nCriteria for Assessing the Sustainability of Logging Operations\u2014A Systematic Review<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">The objective of this review paper is to compile and analyze the most commonly used criteria and indicators for each dimension of sustainability in logging operations over the last 6 years.<br \/>\nThis review provides an overview of these criteria for different harvesting machines, geographical areas, slope classes, time<br \/>\nperiods, types of research, and silvicultural treatments.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Julian Gr\u00fcnberg, Mohammad Reza Ghaffariyan, Meghdad Jourgholami, Eric R. Labelle, Nopparat Kaakkurivaara, Renato Cesar Gon\u00e7alves Robert, Martin K\u00fchmaier<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2023<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">International<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Current Forestry Reports<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-7\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s40725-021-00155-6\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\nStrategies to Mitigate the Efects of Soil Physical Disturbances Caused by Forest Machinery: a Comprehensive Review<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Ground-based mechanized forest operations can cause severe soil disturbances that are often long lasting <br \/>\nand detrimental to the health of forested ecosystems. To reduce these soil disturbances, focus is being increasingly directed at identifying and using appropriate mitigation techniques. This systematic review considered 104 scientific articles and <br \/>\nreported the main findings according to four core themes: terrain-related factors, operational planning, machine modifications, and types of amendments used to mitigate machine-induced soil impacts.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Eric R. Labelle, Linnea Hansson, Lars H\u00f6gbom, Meghdad Jourgholami, Andrea Laschi<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2022<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">International<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Current Forestry Reports<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-8\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/journals\/forests-and-global-change\/articles\/10.3389\/ffgc.2021.780074\/full\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\nImpacts of Logging-Associated<br \/>\nCompaction on Forest Soils: A<br \/>\nMeta-Analysis<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">We performed a meta-analysis on the impact of logging-associated compaction on<br \/>\nforest soils microbial biomass carbon (MBC), bulk density, total porosity, and saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat) affected by two management factors (machine weight and<br \/>\npassage frequency), two soil factors (texture and depth), and the time passed since the compaction event.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Meisam Nazari, Mohammad Eteghadipour, Mohsen Zarebanadkouki,<br \/>\nMohammad Ghorbani, Michaela A. Dippold, Nataliya Bilyera and Kazem Zamanian<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2021<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">International<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Frontiers in Forests and Global Change<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-9\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full\/10.1111\/1365-2664.14554\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\nDead wood distributed in different-sized habitat patches <br \/>\nenhances diversity of saproxylic beetles in a landscape <br \/>\nexperiment<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">In a landscape experiment, we exposed freshly cut beech branches in bundles of different sizes (one, three, six and 12 branches) in the forest, representing newly <br \/>\ncreated habitat patches to be colonized by saproxylic beetles. We investigated how species richness in a \u2018single large\u2019 branch bundle compares to that in \u2018several small\u2019 bundles. We further tested the effects of dead wood availability in the surrounding landscape and <br \/>\nenvironmental factors on species richness, <br \/>\nabundance and community composition.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Elena Haeler, Jonas Stillhard, Karin Hindenlang Clerc, Lo\u00efc Pellissier, Thibault Lachat<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2023<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Suisse<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Journal of Applied Ecology<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-10\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/1999-4907\/13\/1\/109\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\nSoil Compaction after Increasing the Number of Wheeled<br \/>\nTractors Passes on Forest Soils in West Carpathians<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">This study aimed to analyze the changes of surface layers of<br \/>\nsoil caused by skidder traffic without loads on the Cambisols of Western Carpathians. We observed<br \/>\nchanges in the soil bulk density and penetration resistance.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Michal Allman, Zuzana Dud\u00e1kov\u00e1, Martin Jankovsk\u00fd, M\u00e1ria Vlckov\u00e1, Vladim\u00edr Ju\u0161ko and Daniel Tomc\u00edk<br \/>\n<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2022<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">R\u00e9publique Tch\u00e8que<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Forests<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-11\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S0378112718307230\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\nDeadwood management in Central European forests: Key considerations for<br \/>\npractical implementation<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">This paper compiles thekey aspects regarding the implementation of deadwood management in managed forests where the aim is to<br \/>\nfavour biodiversity without compromising or negatively affecting operational and commercial aspects of forest management. Simple deadwood management guidelines rooted in science and forestry expertise aiding decision-making in the efforts to effectively enhance biodiversity without compromising other management objectives are thus provided.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Lucie V\u00edtkov\u00e1, Radek Ba\u010de, Petr Kju\u010dukov, Miroslav Svoboda<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2018<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">R\u00e9publique Tch\u00e8que<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Forest Ecology and Management<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-12\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S1146609X24000420\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\nEffect of litter decomposition and nutrient release from shrub litter on<br \/>\nenzymatic activity and C\/N\/P stoichiometry of soils in a temperate<br \/>\npine forest<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">The aim of this study was to determine the<br \/>\neffect of litter decomposition and nutrient release from litter with an admixture of shrubs on enzymatic activity<br \/>\nand C\/N\/P stoichiometry of soils. The study included pine monocultures and pine stands with an admixture of<br \/>\nrowan or alder buckthorn or European hazelnut. The decomposition of litter with shrub<br \/>\nadmixture occurs much faster compared to pine litter, which has a positive effect on the C\/N\/P stoichiometry<br \/>\nand the enzymatic activity of soils.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Marzena Ka\u00b4zmierczak, Ewa B\u0142onska, Jaros\u0142aw Lasota<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2024<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Pologne<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Acta Oecologica<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-13\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S1146609X22000121\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\nFine woody debris as a biogen reservoir in forest ecosystems<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">The aim of this study was to determine the amount of released components from decaying fine woody debris (FWD). The experiment included three species of wood (Abies alba, Alnus glutinosa, Fraxinus excelsior) and a control without wood. Our results suggest that FWD in forest ecosystems is an important element of the nutrient cycle and deadwood <br \/>\ndecomposition is an essential ecosystem process by which nutrients are delivered to the soil.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Jaros\u0142aw Lasota, Wojciech Piaszczyk, Ewa B\u0142onska<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2022<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Pologne<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Acta Oecologica<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-14\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/forestry\/advance-article\/doi\/10.1093\/forestry\/cpae013\/7641207\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\nField estimation of fallen deadwood volume under different management approaches in two European protected forested areas<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">In this study, we assessed fallen deadwood volume in two large national parks\u2014one being a more actively managed landscape with overall lower levels of fallen deadwood, and the other having a strict non-intervention approach with higher levels of deadwood.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">M\u00e9lody Rousseau, Devara P. Adiningrat, Andrew K. Skidmore, Andjin Siegenthaler, Tiejun Wang, Haidi Abdullah<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2024<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Pays-Bas<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-15\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S0378112723000245\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\nThe sustainability of timber and biomass harvest in perspective of forest <br \/>\nnutrient uptake and nutrient stocks<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">We used a new forest experiment to quantify nutrient stocks and nutrient uptake rates in mature forest stands, <br \/>\nand to assess the forest nutrient balance in relation to different forest management scenarios: clearcutting, <br \/>\nshelterwood and thinning; and whole-tree harvest (WTH), stem-only harvest (SOH) and wood only harvest <br \/>\n(WOH, with on-site bark stripping).<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Marleen A.E. Vos, Jan den Ouden, Marcel Hoosbeek, Martin Valtera, Wim de Vries, <br \/>\nFrank Sterck <\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2023<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Pays-Bas<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Forest Ecology and Management<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-16\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10533-024-01170-y\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\nFrom deadwood to forest soils: quantifying a key carbon flux in boreal ecosystems<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Deadwood represents a dynamic carbon <br \/>\npool in forest ecosystems where microbial decompo\u0002sition causes fuxes of CO2 to the atmosphere through respiration and organic carbon to the soil through <br \/>\nleakage and fragmentation. This study character\u0002ises diferent stages of deadwood of Norway spruce (Picea abies).<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Jogeir Stokland, Gry Alfredsen<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2024<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Norv\u00e8ge<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Biogeochemistry<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-17\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2673-4133\/4\/1\/3\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\nThe Necrobiome of Deadwood: The Life after Death<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">The present work aims to<br \/>\nprovide an overview of the biodiversity and role of the microbial communities that inhabit deadwood<br \/>\nand their possible involvement in greenhouse gas (CO2<br \/>\n, N2O, and CH4<br \/>\n) emissions.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Roberta Pastorelli, Isabella De Meo and Alessandra Lagomarsino<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2023<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Italie<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Ecologies<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-18\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S0378112719317700\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\nVehicle-induced compaction of forest soil affects plant morphological and<br \/>\nphysiological attributes: A meta-analysis<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">We analyzed 45 articles for above-ground and below-ground morphological traits<br \/>\nand 17 articles for physiological traits, and found significant declines following soil compaction. Our findings suggest that the shorter<br \/>\nmain roots developed due to soil compaction reduce water uptake and thus photosynthesis and the overall plant<br \/>\nphysiological performance.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Barbara Mariottia, Yasutomo Hoshikab, Martina Cambia, Elena Marraa, Zhaozhong Fengc, Elena Paolettib, Enrico Marchi<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2020<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Italie<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Forest Ecology and Management<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-19\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S1364032119302990\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\nEcological restrictions in forest biomass extraction for a sustainable<br \/>\nrenewable energy production<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">This research contributes to a more sustainable<br \/>\nuse of the forest biomass for bioenergy purposes.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">E.N. Manolisa, T.D. Zagasa, G.K. Karetsosc, C.A. Poravou<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2019<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Gr\u00e8ce<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-20\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full\/10.1002\/ldr.4902\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\nA Meta-analysis of the effects of ground-based extraction<br \/>\ntechnologies on fine roots in forest soils<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">As with all the features of forest soil, the compaction related to the forest operations and, in particular, to the wood extraction via ground-based technologies could lead to a significant impact on the presence of fine roots in the soil affected by the passage of the machines. Considering the lack of a review, we used a meta-analytic approach to synthesise effect<br \/>\nsizes of ground-based extraction technologies affecting the presence of fine roots in<br \/>\nthe soil, using a multivariate mixed-effects meta-analytic model.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Francesco Latterini, Marcin K. Dyderski, Pawe\u0142 Horodecki, Mateusz Rawlik, Walter Stefanoni, Lars H\u00f6gbom, Rachele Venanzi, Rodolfo Picchio, Andrzej M. Jagodzinski<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2023<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Europe<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Wiley<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-21\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/publication\/355703554_Methods_of_Protection_Forest_Soils_during_Logging_Operations_Review\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\nMethods of Protection Forest Soils during Logging Operations (Review)<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Public opinion has become increasingly critical of current logging methods and <br \/>\ntechnologies, and there is a demand for standards to guide the operations of environmentally <br \/>\nimpactful industries. For many years, numerous researchers have studied the impact of log\u0002ging on forest soils, revealing that there is a high risk of damaging forest soil during forest <br \/>\noperations and terrain transport. Here we analyse and review a total of 105 publications in this <br \/>\narea.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Aleksey S. Ilintsev, Elena N. Nakvasina, Lars H\u00f6gbom<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2021<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Russie\/Su\u00e8de<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Russian Forestry Journal<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-22\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/journal.uma.ac.ir\/article_1852_59312298f5697b1b85fc28647ae72f61.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\nEffect of forestry practices on the biological characteristics of soils <br \/>\n(Case study: Beech Forest of Asalem)<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">this study has tried to gain a better understanding of the relationship between soil biological <br \/>\nconditions and forest management methods and their application in sustainable forest and soil management by evaluating the effect of different forestry methods on soil biological characteristics.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Hoda Esfandiari, Kiomars Sefidi, Akbar Ghavidel, Mohammad Esmaeilpour, Beitollah <br \/>\nAmanzadeh, Seyed Mohammad Moein Sadeghi<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2022<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Iran<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Water and Soil Management and Modeling<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-23\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/1999-4907\/15\/6\/985\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\nAssessing the Extent and Severity of the Impact on Forest<br \/>\nSoils of Two Different Fully Mechanized Timber<br \/>\nHarvesting Operations<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Soil disturbances during ground-based mechanized operations in South Korea are not fully<br \/>\ninvestigated and difficult to avoid. Therefore, we compared the soil displacement and compaction<br \/>\n(bulk density and hydraulic conductivity) between two different operations: cut-to-length (CTL)<br \/>\nlogging with a harvester and forwarder, and whole-tree (WTH) logging with a harvester and skidder.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Eunjai Lee, Taehyung Kim, Ho-Seong Mun, Jae-Heun Oh and Sang-Kyun Han<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2024<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Cor\u00e9e<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Forests<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-24\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2223-7747\/12\/13\/2468\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\nDetrimental Effects of Induced Soil Compaction on Morphological Adaptation and Physiological Plasticity of Selected Multipurpose Tree Species<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">This study was conducted to analyze<br \/>\nthe impact of compacted soil on germination and initial growth stages of four major agro-forest<br \/>\ntrees of central Punjab, Pakistan. Morpho-physiological traits of all selected species (Eucalyptus<br \/>\ncamaldulensis, Albizia lebbeck, Vachellia nilotica, and Zyziphus mauritiana) were measured against soil<br \/>\ncompaction.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Muhammad Asif, Muhammad Farrakh Nawaz, Irfan Ahmad, Muhammad Haroon U. Rashid, Taimoor Hassan Farooq, Muhammad Kashif, Sadaf Gul and Qian Li<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2023<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Pakistan<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Plants<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-25\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S0016706123001507\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\nSoil compaction in skid trails still affects topsoil recovery 28 years after <br \/>\nlogging in Central Amazonia<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">The present study sought to determine if this was a full recovery by investigating additional attributes, such as soil chemical properties and <br \/>\nfine root biomass (FRB). In addition, forest floor litter was investigated to present a more complete view of soil <br \/>\nrecovery dynamics.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Daniel DeArmond, Joao Baptista Silva Ferraz, Lidiane Rodrigues de Oliveira, <br \/>\nAdriano Jos\u00b4e Nogueira Lima, Newton Paulo de Souza Falcao, \u02dc Niro Higuchi<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2023<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Br\u00e9sil<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Geoderma<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-26\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/ri.conicet.gov.ar\/bitstream\/handle\/11336\/232242\/CONICET_Digital_Nro.2c123dec-b733-4776-a107-b07e34d8357b_B.pdf?sequence=2&amp;isAllowed=y\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\nDoes logging affect soil biodiversity and its functions? A review<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">We conducted a qualitative systematic literature review to assess the current state of knowledge about the impact of <br \/>\nlogging on soil biodiversity and ecosystem functions. We addressed the effects of logging operations (e.g., clear-cutting, selective <br \/>\nlogging) on i) soil organisms (from microorganisms to soil fauna) and ii) soil functions mediated by soil biota.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Mar\u00eda Laura Moreno, Jos\u00e9 Camilo Bedano, Luis Rivera and Natalia Politi<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2023<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Argentine<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"> Soil Organisms<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-27\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S0961953424002204\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\nAssessing the sustainability of forest biomass harvesting practices in the <br \/>\nsoutheastern US to meet European renewable energy goals<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">This study evaluated the current state of knowledge regarding the sustainability of woody biomass and wood pellet feedstock harvesting on the effects of woody residue, soil characteristics, biodiversity, carbon, and water quality. Our survey of existing literature revealed a lack of research <br \/>\nevaluating the effects of forest residue removal across the southeastern US.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Hannah C.M. Bays, M. Chad Bolding, Joseph L. Conrad, Holly L. Munro, Scott. Barrett, Alicia Peduzzi<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2024<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Etats-Unis<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Biomass and Bioenergy<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-28\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/journals\/forests-and-global-change\/articles\/10.3389\/ffgc.2023.791766\/full\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\nLogging has legacy effects on the structure of soil fungal communities several decades after cessation in Western Cascade forest stands<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Together, these results have repercussions for the regeneration of<br \/>\nforests following logging, as the composition of fungal guilds important to plant<br \/>\nfunctions do not fully recover even after decades of cessation.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Max W. Spencer, Bitty A. Roy, Tiffany E. Thornton, Lucas C. R. Silva and Krista L. McGuire<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2023<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Etats-Unis<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Frontiers in Forests and Global Change<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-29\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/profile\/Mark-Kimsey-2\/publication\/348442921_Soil_Sustainability_and_Harvest_Operations_A_Review\/links\/5fff3b4c299bf1408893c4ce\/Soil-Sustainability-and-Harvest-Operations-A-Review.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\nSoil Sustainability and Harvest Operations: A Review<\/a><br \/>\n<\/td><td class=\"column-2\"> We highlight the literature about long-term soil recovery after <br \/>\ntimber harvests and review the types of impacts, harvest operation methods, and recovery times.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Leslee J. Crawford, Robert Heinse, Mark J. Kimsey, Deborah S. Page-Dumroese<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2021<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Etats-Unis<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">U.S. Department of Agriculture<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-30\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S037811272100356X\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\nSoil compaction and organic matter removal effects on soil properties and <br \/>\ntree growth in the Interior Douglas-fir zone of southern British Columbia<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Silviculture systems and associated forest harvesting practices that affect the level of soil compaction and organic <br \/>\nmatter retained on a site will cause changes to soil properties and processes that may affect the growth of planted <br \/>\ntrees. We present results for soil conditions and tree growth after 15 years for 6 Long-term Soil Productivity Study <br \/>\n(LTSP) installations in 2 distinct regions of the Interior Douglas-fir (IDF) biogeoclimatic zone in southern British <br \/>\nColumbia (BC).<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Brian Wallace, Chuck Bulmer, Graeme Hope, Mike Curran , Tim Philpott, Michael Murray<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2021<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Canada<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Forest Ecology and Management<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-31\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s13705-021-00281-w\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"> Sustainable forest biomass: a review <br \/>\nof current residue harvesting guidelines<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">This review provides <br \/>\na comprehensive resource for those developing guidelines, or defning sustainability standards for market access or <br \/>\ncompliance with public regulations, and\/or concerned about the sustainability of forest biomass harvesting.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Brian D. Titus, Kevin Brown, Helj\u00e4\u2011Sisko Helmisaari, Elena Vanguelova, Inge Stupak, Alexander Evans, Nicholas Clarke, Claudia Guidi, Viktor J. Bruckman, Iveta Varnagiryte\u2011Kabasinskiene, K\u0119stutis Armolaitis, Wim de Vries, Keizo Hirai, Lilli Kaarakka, Karen Hogg and Pam Reece<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2021<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Monde<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Energy, Sustainability<br \/>\nand Society<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-32\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"\/Users\/aamm\/AppData\/Local\/Temp\/Estimating_the_environmentally_compatible_bio-energy_potential_from_agriculture.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Ecological and environmental concerns of the forest biomass use for energy production. Acritical review of the current situation<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">The present report highlights the possible ecological and environmental constraints that will be encountered when harvesting biomass from existing forests. Some of the constraints presented in this report were identified not in research targeted at biomass harvest. However the results are valid for this use.\u00a0<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">M\u00e1th\u00e9 L\u00e1szl\u00f3, Duncan Pollard<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2005<\/td><td class=\"column-5\"><\/td><td class=\"column-6\">European environment agency<\/td><td class=\"column-7\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-33\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S0301421510009390\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Recent developments of biofuels\/bioenergy sustainability certification: A global overview<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">The objective of this paper is to provide a review on the latest developments on the main initiatives and approaches for the sustainability certification for biofuels and\/or bioenergy. A large number of national and international initiatives lately experienced rapid development in the view of the biofuels and bioenergy targets announced in the European Union, United States and other countries worldwide.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Nicolae Scarlat , Jean-Fran\u00e7ois Dallemand -<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2011<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Monde<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Energy Policy<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-34\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/mdc.mo.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/2020-10\/woody_biomass_harvesting_bmp_book.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Missouri Woody BiomassHarvesting. Best Management Practices Manuel<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">This booklet has been prepared to inform forest owners, loggers, foresters and other interested persons about woody biomass harvesting best management practices (BMPs). These BMPs provide recommendations designed to protect the forest that the citizens of Missouri rely on for jobs, clean air and water, diverse wildlife habitat, scenic beauty, outdoor recreation and tourism.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Doug Enyart; Dr. Francisco Aguilar; Dr. Bill Kurtz; Rosanna Hernandez<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2010<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Etats-Unis<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Missouri Department of Conservation<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-35\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/newenglandcottontail.org\/sites\/default\/files\/research_documents\/Forest%20Biomass%20Retention%20and%20Harvesting%20Guidelines.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Forest Biomass Retention and Harvesting Guidelines for the Northeast<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">These guidelines are based on the Forest Guild\u2019s principles. Forest Guild members are concerned with reconciling biomass removals with the principles of excellent forestry\u2014 forestry that is ecologically, economically, and socially responsible.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Bob Perschel; Alexander Evans; Mike DeBonis<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2010<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Etats-Unis<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Forest Guild<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-36\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/mimlc.com\/PDF\/Woody-Biomass-Harvesting-Guidance.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Michigan Woody Biomass Harvesting Guidance<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">The purpose of the WBHG is to provide a broad context for harvesting woody biomass from forest land within a sustainable forest management framework, as well as specific technical recommendations. It is expected that this guidance will be revised as research, practices, science, technology, practical experience, and knowledge add to the understanding of woody biomass harvesting\/processing in a forest setting.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Jennifer M. Granholm<br \/>\nRebecca A. Humphries\u00a0<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2010<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Etats-Unis<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Michigan DNRE<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-37\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/dnr.maryland.gov\/forests\/Documents\/publications\/MDBiomassGuidelines.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">A Guide to Forest Biomass Harvesting and Retention in Maryland<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">These guidelines are based on a comprehensive review of the potential ecological risks associated with biomass harvesting and a review of Maryland\u2019s existing forest management programs. It should be noted that many of the recommended practices contained within this document are standard forest management operations, whereas other practices contained herein may be new to many.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Brian A. Kittler ; Christopher M. Beauvais<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2010<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Etats-Unis<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Pinchot institute<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-38\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\">Recommendations for the Harvesting of Woody Biomass<\/td><td class=\"column-2\">The following recommendations are offered to assist landowners, loggers and the users of woody biomass in making sound decisions regarding biomass harvesting and removal while ensuring the sustainability of the forest resources.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\"><\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2011<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Etats-Unis<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Fiche d'information<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-39\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.confor.org.uk\/media\/246145\/forest-and-water-guidelines.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Forests and water. UK forestry standard guidelines<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Forests and Water is one of a series of seven Guidelines that support the United Kingdom Forestry Standard (UKFS). The UKFS and Guidelines outline the context for forestry in the UK, set out the approach of the UK governments to sustainable forest management, define standards and requirements, and provide a basis for regulation and monitoring \u2013 including national and international reporting.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\"><\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2011<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Royaume-Uni<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Forestry commission<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-40\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"http:\/\/franceboisforet.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/guide-eau-forestiere.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Prot\u00e9ger et valoriser l'eau foresti\u00e8re. Guide pratique national r\u00e9alis\u00e9 dans le cadre du programme\"EAU + FOR\"\u00a0<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Son objectif : pr\u00e9server l\u2019eau foresti\u00e8re destin\u00e9e \u00e0 la consommation humaine. Cela n\u00e9cessite de concilier protection de la ressource en eau et production de bois. Pour atteindre ce but, il faut am\u00e9liorer la compr\u00e9hension des enjeux for\u00eat et eau en facilitant la concertation entre acteurs et en appliquant des recommandations foresti\u00e8res adapt\u00e9es. <\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Aur\u00e9lien Bansept, Julien Fiquerpron<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2014<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">France<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">FPF; FBF; CNPF<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Livre<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-41\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/hal.inrae.fr\/hal-02664482\/document\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Bois-\u00e9nergie : ma\u00eetriser les impacts<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">S\u2019il est d\u2019une br\u00fblante actualit\u00e9, le bois-\u00e9nergie n\u2019est pas une nouveaut\u00e9. Souvenons-nous : les d\u00e9buts de l\u2019\u00e8re industrielle, la surexploitation des taillis, la d\u00e9gradation s\u00e9v\u00e8re et persistante des sols fragiles\u2026 Raisonnons aujourd\u2019hui en termes de gestion durable et pr\u00e9servons, entre autres, les sols.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Jacques Ranger, Caroline Rantien, Alain Brethes, Patrice Mengin-Lecreulx et Thierry Sardin\u00a0<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2007<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">France<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Rendez-vous techniques de l'ONF<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-42\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"http:\/\/bfw.ac.at\/030\/pdf\/1818_pi13.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">\u00d6kologische Grenzen der Biomassenutzung in W\u00e4ldern<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Die Forstwirtschaft kann die steigende Nachfrage nach Holz und Biomasse nur durch h\u00f6here Nutzungen abdecken, beispielsweise durch Ganz- baumnutzung. Unter dem Gesichtspunkt einer Nachhaltigkeit der Hauptn\u00e4hrstoffvorr\u00e4te im Waldboden ergibt sich jedoch die Forderung: Die Nadel- und Blattmasse, wenn m\u00f6glich auch das Feinreisig, sollen im Wald verbleiben.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Michael English<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2007<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Autriche<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">BFW<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-43\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.lwf.bayern.de\/mam\/cms04\/service\/dateien\/potenziale_und_restriktionen_der_biomassenutzung.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Potenziale und Restriktionen der Biomassenutzung im Wald\u00a0<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Einer der in der forstlichen Diskussion unserer Tage meistverwendeten Begriffe ist das Nutzungspotenzial. Nicht nur die Ergebnisse der zweiten Bundeswaldinventur, auch die Entwicklung neuer M\u00e4rkte f\u00fcr die Verwer - tung schw\u00e4cherer Sortimente und Reisig geben Anreize zur vermehrten Nutzung von Holz und Biomasse.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Karl Josef Meiwes, Norbert Asche, Joachim Block, Reinhard Kallweit, Christian K\u00f6lling, Gerhard Raben, Klaus von Wilper<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2008<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Autriche<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">AFZ-DerWald<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-44\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/agriculture.gouv.fr\/sites\/minagri\/files\/documents\/pdf\/Guide_PFB.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Mieux int\u00e9grer la biodiversit\u00e9 dans la gestion foresti\u00e8re<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Ce guide s'adresse aux professionnels de la for\u00eat, mais \u00e9galement aux propri\u00e9taires forestiers publics et priv\u00e9s pour leur apporter les \u00e9clairages utiles sur la mani\u00e8re de mieux prendre en compte l'\u00e9cologie dans la gestion durable de leur for\u00eat.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Marion Gosselin, Yoan Paillet\u00a0<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2010<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">France<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Quae<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Livre<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-45\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cdn.forestresearch.gov.uk\/2012\/04\/fcpg020.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Managing deadwood in forests and woodlands<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">This Guide has been written for woodland owners and managers who want to know where and how to manage woodlands for deadwood \u2013 to help improve forest condition and fulfil objectives for sustainable forest management and the UK Biodiversity Action Plan.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Jonathan Humphrey et Sallie Bailey<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2012<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Royaume-Uni<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Forestry commission<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-46\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\">Forest Harvesting and the Environment Guidelines<\/td><td class=\"column-2\">The forest harvesting and the environment guidelines have been developed through extensive consultation with a wide range of relevant parties. They set out sound and practical measures based on the principles of Sustainable Forest Management (SFM), and are firmly rooted in the best available scientific information. The guidelines will be kept under review to facilitate amendment in the light of new research findings.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">DEPARTMENT OF THE MARINE AND NATURAL RESOURCES DUBLIN IRL FOREST SERVICE<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2000<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Ireland<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">DEPARTMENT OF THE MARINE AND NATURAL RESOURCES DUBLIN IRL FOREST SERVICE<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-47\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.diva-portal.org\/smash\/get\/diva2:702651\/FULLTEXT01.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Increased biomass harvesting for bioenergy. Effects on biodiversity, landscape amenities and cultural heritage values\u00a0<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">The overall objective for this review is to present a coherent overview of current knowledge on the effects of biomass harvesting for the purpose of bioenergy on biodiversity, landscape amenities (especially outdoor recreation), and cultural heritage values in Fennoscandia. <\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Erik Framstad (ed.) H\u00e5kan Berglund, Vegard Gundersen, Raimo Heikkil\u00e4, Noora Lankinen, Taru Peltola, Ole Risb\u00f8l, and Martin Weih -<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2009<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Pays baltes et scandinaves<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">norden<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-48\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?referer=http:\/\/www.gip-ecofor.org\/&amp;httpsredir=1&amp;article=1015&amp;context=aes_miscpubs\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Considerations and Recommendations for Retaining Woody Biomass on Timber Harvest Sites in Maine<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">The objective of this report is to recommend guidelines for retention of woody biomass on harvest sites from a general perspective (Section 3) and with respect to soil productivity (Section 4), water quality (Section 5), and site-level biodiversity (Section 6). Background information is provided on each topic based on a review of relevant scientific literature and harvesting guidelines from other states with similar forest types and markets. <\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Jeffrey G. Benjamin<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2010<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Etats-Unis<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">The University of Maine<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-49\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\">Sustainable Biomass Retention and Harvesting Guidelines<\/td><td class=\"column-2\">As this edition of Forest Wisdom demonstrates, using biomass for energy presents a suite of complex technical and social issues. Sound science and public policy is needed to both protect natural resources and make informed renewable energy decisions. The Forest Guild recognizes these complexities and is a leader in addressing the ecological sustainability of biomass harvesting and utilization. At the same time, we understand that there are valid ecological and economic reasons to use biomass for energy and that these benefits need to be considered in the broader biomass dialogue.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Marcia Summers\u00a0<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2011<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Etats-Unis<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">\u00a0<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">communication<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-50\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/repository.lib.ncsu.edu\/handle\/1840.4\/8104\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">An Analysis of Woody Biomass Harvesting Guidelines (BHGs) for North Carolina Forestry<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">The goal of this paper is to aid North Carolina\u2019s best management practices technical committee in the development of guidelines for the sustainable harvest of woody biomass in the state. <\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Brunell Gugelmann<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2011<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Etats-Unis<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-51\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/content.ces.ncsu.edu\/sustainable-woody-biomass-harvesting-minimizing-impacts\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Sustainable Woody Biomass Harvesting: Minimizing Impacts <\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\"><\/td><td class=\"column-3\"><\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2019<\/td><td class=\"column-5\"><\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-52\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/content.ces.ncsu.edu\/catalog\/series\/85\/\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\"><\/td><td class=\"column-3\"><\/td><td class=\"column-4\"><\/td><td class=\"column-5\"><\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-53\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"SANS\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Forest Biomass Harvesting Recommendations: A Supplement to South Carolina\u2019s Best Management Practices for Forestry<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">These recommendations are intended to supplement South Carolina\u2019s Best Management Practices for Forestry in situations where more woody material is removed than during traditional forestry operations.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\"><\/td><td class=\"column-4\"><\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Etats-Unis<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-54\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/foreststewardsguild.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/FG_Biomass_Guidelines_SE.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Forest Biomass Retention and Harvesting. Guidelines for the Southeast<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Guidelines for ensuring forests can support wildlife, maintain biodiversity, provide clean water, sequester carbon, protect forest soil productivity, and continue to produce income after a biomass harvest or repeated harvests.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Forest Guild Southeast Biomass Working Group<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2012<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Etats-Unis<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-55\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/foreststewardsguild.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/FG_Biomass_Guidelines_PNW.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Forest Biomass Retention and Harvesting Guidelines for the Pacific Northwest<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Biomass Retention and Harvesting Guidelines The Forest Guild developed these biomass retention and harvesting guidelines for foresters who put the highest priority on maintenance and enhancement of the entire forest ecosystem. Where economic objectives are paramount, we hope these guidelines also add val e, because maintenance of ecosystem function through retention of dead wood is important for long-term forest health. Our focus is not the destination of the wood or biomass removed, but the condition of the forest after harvest.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Forest Guild Pacific Northwest Biomass Working Group<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2013<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Etats-Unis<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-56\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.benelux.int\/files\/7113\/9177\/0418\/energiehout_fr.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Utilisation durable du bois-\u00e9nergie dans le Benelux. Quelques bonnes pratiques<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Ce document s\u2019adresse aux personnes impliqu\u00e9es dans la production d\u2019\u00e9nergie ou toute autre utilisation de la biomasse provenant du bois (les produits chimiques, les carburants de seconde et troisi\u00e8me g\u00e9n\u00e9ration) et\/ou de l\u2019approvisionnement du secteur (production et r\u00e9colte de bois). Le contenu a \u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e9labor\u00e9 pour des lecteurs qui r\u00e9fl\u00e9chissent et agissent d\u00e9j\u00e0 selon les principes de gestion durable et qui veulent exploiter la biomasse bois comme une mati\u00e8re premi\u00e8re locale, \u00e9cologique et renouvelable, que ce soit pour des applications \u00e9nerg\u00e9tiques ou autres.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Marc Naessens\u00a0et al.<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2011<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Benelux\u00a0<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Fiche d'information<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-57\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"http:\/\/shop.skogsstyrelsen.se\/shop\/9098\/art62\/4645962-9b6e2b-1545.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Recommendations for the extraction of forest fuel and compensation fertilising<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">The recommendations below outline how th e National Board of Forestry, Sweden considers the extraction of forest fuels and compensation fertilising should be conducted in order to avoid any undesirable effects on the nutritional balance in the soil, on the biological diversity and the water quality in lakes, watercourses and water tables, and also to avoid any net flow of noxious substances (e.g. heavy metals) into the soil. <\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Hans Samuelsson\u00a0<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2002<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Su\u00e8de<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-58\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cdn.forestresearch.gov.uk\/1997\/01\/wth.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Whole-tree Harvesting. A guide to good practice\u00a0<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">This guide provides operational guidance to managers on the potential impacts of whole-tree harvesting upon the forest ecosystem. It also considers the likely risks on different sites and makes recommendations for managers faced with different harvesting options.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">T. Nisbet, J. Dutch and A. Moffat\u00a0<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">1997<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Royaume-Uni<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-59\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.forestresearch.gov.uk\/publications\/stump-harvesting-interim-guidance-on-site-selection-and-good-practice\/\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Stump Harvesting: Interim Guidance on Site Selection and Good Practice<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">The guidance is largely based on expert judgement of the scientific issues informed by practical experience of managing forest soils. Uncertainties remain about the long-term sustainability of stump harvesting on certain soil types, which will require new research to quantify impacts and check that the guidance is fit for purpose<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Anonyme<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2009<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Royaume-Uni<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-60\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cdn.forestresearch.gov.uk\/2009\/05\/brash_residue_protocol.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Guidance on site selection for brash removal<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">The existing guidance classifies a large part of the forest estate as being potentially sensitive to the removal of brash, leading to a shortage of suitable sites. This has prompted a re-examination of the original criteria for defining sensitive soils and waters.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Anonyme<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2009<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Royaume-Uni<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-61\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/dovetailinc.org\/report_pdfs\/2009\/dovetailbioguides0709.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Energy from woody biomass: a review of harvesting guidelines and a discussion of related challenges<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">In some regions, including several U.S. states, guidelines have been developed for removal of woody biomass from forested areas. similarly, guidelines for removal of agricultural residues, in anticipation of commercialization of cellulosic ethanol and other fuels, have been developed. This report provides a brief overview of forest biomass harvesting guidelines and their importance in the United States and other reg ions of the world.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Kathryn Fernholz, Steve Bratkovich, Jim Bowyer, Alison Lindurgh<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2009<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Etats-Unis<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-62\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/ucanr.edu\/sites\/forestry\/files\/161616.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Chapter 11: Existing State Woody Biomass Harvesting Guidelines<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">This chapter will review the common themes identified in Evans et al. (2010) and found within the existing state woody biomass harvesting guidelines. A brief discussion of the experiences in Canada and northern Europe is also included. Six states have functioning woody biomass harvesting guidelines, and several more are beginning the process of guideline development. California regulators may find a review of these existing woody biomass harvesting guidelines informative as they begin the guideline development process. Understanding the ecological and economic differences between California and the states with existing guidelines will be important so that recommendations found in other state guidelines can be evaluated within the context of California\u2019s environment<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">William Stewart, Robert F. Powers, Kathryn McGown, Lindsay Chiono, Teresa Chuang<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2011<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Etats-Unis<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-63\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nefainfo.org\/uploads\/2\/7\/4\/5\/27453461\/nefa_biomass_bmp_comparison_report_final_9.2012.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">A Review of Biomass Harvesting Best Management<br \/>\nPractices Guidelines<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">The North East State Foresters Association (NEFA) conducted a thorough review of all the biomass harvesting guidelines that have been developed at the state level in the U.S., in other countries, and also within the existing forest certification systems. Many states have some form of harvesting guidelines for protection of water quality (Best Management Practices or BMPs), but these do not usually cover biomass harvesting explicitly. Therefore, standard BMPs are not covered in this review.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Anonyme<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2012<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Etats-Unis<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-64\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Overview of Forest Biomass Harvesting Guidelines<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\"><\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Evans, Kittler, Perschel<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2012<\/td><td class=\"column-5\"><\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-65\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\">State Issues Guidelines for Forest Biomass Harvesting. Surging Interest in Biomass Spurs Concern for Soil, Water, and Habitat<\/td><td class=\"column-2\">In light of the increasing demand for wood fiber, some states, such as Pennsylvania, have released guidelines for both their state and private forestland, and Maine, Michigan, and Wisconsin plan to publish guidelines later this year.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Steve Wilent<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2008<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Etats-Unis<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-66\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/foreststewardsguild.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/biomass_guidelines.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Revised Assessment of Biomass Harvesting Guidelines<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Intensification of biomass utilization, particularly for energy and fuel needs, presents a range of potential e nvironmental risks. This report provides a review of guidelines put forth by states and ot her entities to avoid these environmental risks and promote the ecological sustainability of forest biomass utilization.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Alexander M. Evans, Robert T.\u00a0Perschel et Brian A.Kittler<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2010<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Monde<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-67\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/heatingthemidwest.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/BiomassHarvestingFactSheet0412.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Protecting Minnesota\u2019s Forests While Utilizing Biomass Resources. An overview of the Minnesota Forest Resources Council\u2019s Forest Biomass Harvesting Guidelines<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Guidelines Key Considerations to maintain and enhance the resiliency of Minnesota\u2019s public and private forests. <\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Anonyme\u00a0<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2012<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Etats-Unis<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">fiche d'information<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-68\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cdn.forestresearch.gov.uk\/2005\/12\/fctn011.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Protecting the Environment during Mechanised Harvesting Operations<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Best practice can minimise the risk of environmental damage during harvesting operations on soft ground. This may increase operational costs but can be justified by the need to protect soils and prevent erosion and subsequent siltation within watercourses. The selection of preventive rather than \u2018first aid\u2019 methods should be encouraged.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Ian Murgatroyd et Colin Saunders<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2005<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Royaume-Uni<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Synth\u00e8se<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-69\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cdn.forestresearch.gov.uk\/2006\/02\/fcpn013.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Managing Brash on Conifer Clearfell Sites<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">This Practice Note gives guidance on the range of available options for brash management, and the possible consequences of each option.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Andy Moffat, Bill M Jones et Bill Mason<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2006<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Royaume-Uni<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Synth\u00e8se<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-70\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/ucanr.edu\/sites\/Mendocino\/files\/17408.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Biomass Harvesting Guidelines for Forestlands, Brushlands and Open Lands<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">These guidelines focus on how to protect the functions and values of forest resources during woody biomass harvesting management activities. They generally do not provide advice on whether to manage or which management activities are needed. These guidelines do, however, recommend avoiding or modifying biomass harvest of some sites of statewide ecological significance or ecological sensitivity.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">anonyme<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2007<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Etats-Unis<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-71\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.biombioe.2005.07.018\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Water quality protection in bioenergy production: the US system of forestry Best Management Practices<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">United States federal law requires that states operate programs to address non-point source pollution. Forestry non-point source programs vary among states in their approach. Some states have laws that prescribe mandatory practices to control pollution, whereas other states use voluntary approaches of Best Management Practices (BMPs) and education and outreach programs. States routinely monitor the extent of BMP implementation so as to improve educational programs and thus improve implementation. Many states also have conducted studies to assess whether BMPs are effective in protecting water quality. A growing body of literature strongly suggests that properly implemented BMPs do protect water quality.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">James P. Shepard<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2006<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Etats-Unis<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 30, Issue 4, pp. 378-384<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-72\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/digitalprairie.ok.gov\/digital\/collection\/stgovpub\/id\/17846\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Forestry best management practise guidelines for water quality management in Oklahoma<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Forestry Best Management Practice Guidelines, or BMPs, are proposed in this document as (1) a supplement to the technical BMPs on for est practices and road construction now contained in the State Water Quality M anagement Plan, and (2) for current use by forest owners and operators and by state a gencies for BMP implementation.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Anonyme<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">1991 --> 2008<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Etats-Unis<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article --> Guide<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-73\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.pnr-millevaches.fr\/IMG\/pdf\/guide_bonnes_pratiques_sylviculture_et_cours_eau.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Sylviculture et cours d'eau. Guide des bonnes pratiiques<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Ce guide de bonnes pratiques est destin\u00e9 \u00e0 l\u2019ensemble des gestionnaires de la for\u00eat (propri\u00e9taires, entrepreneurs, exploitants...) et des milieux aquatiques (techniciens rivi\u00e8res...). Tout d\u2019abord, il souligne le r\u00f4le positif de la for\u00eat pour la ressource en eau, les milieux naturels et l\u2019homme. Ensuite, il d\u00e9crit les milieux aquatiques, leur int\u00e9r\u00eat et les possibles causes et cons\u00e9quences de leur d\u00e9gradation par l\u2019activit\u00e9 sylvicole. Puis, il propose, pour chaque \u00e9tape sylvicole, des solutions techniques permettant de pr\u00e9server les milieux et de poursuivre l\u2019exploitation foresti\u00e8re. En parall\u00e8le, il fait un rappel de la r\u00e9glementation en vigueur. Enfin, il identifie tous les acteurs du territoire que les gestionnaires peuvent solliciter.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">S\u00e9verine Ecuvillon et Vincent Mennessier, Groupe de travail sylviculture et milieux aquatiques<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2014<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">France<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-74\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\">A review of best management practices for forest watershe biomass harvests with an emphasis on recommandations for leaving residual wood onside<\/td><td class=\"column-2\">One assignment resulting from the workshop was a review of best management practices (BMPs) de veloped by states to address biomass harvesting. A specific focus was whether or not the stat es recommended leaving residual wood onsite for habitat, soil, and water conservation. Upon review, we found that many st ates are adopting state biomass harvesting guidelines (SBHGs) and, furtherm ore, that there are already reviews of these emerging, focused BMPs.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">George Ice, Matt McBroom, Stephen F. Austin, Peter Schweitzer<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2010<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Etats-Unis<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-75\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.agriculture.gov.ie\/media\/migration\/forestry\/publications\/water_quality.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Forestry and Water Quality Guidlines<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">The guidelines describe a range of measures intended to cover all situations relating to forestry and water quality. Not all of the measures outlined will be applicable to every site. However, it is the responsibility of forest owners to identify and apply those measures which are appropriate to their particular forest.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Anonyme\u00a0<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2000<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Royaume-Uni<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-76\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.skogsstyrelsen.se\/globalassets\/om-oss\/rapporter\/rapporter-2021202020192018\/rapport-2021-11-sustainable-boreal-forest-management-challenges-and-opportunities-for-climate-change-mitigation-002.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Recommendations for logging residues harvesting and ash recycling<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">The following recommendations specify how the Swedish Forest Agency believes extraction of harvesting residues (mainly branch es and tree tops) and ash recycling should be done to avoid negative effects on biological diversity or on contents of nutrients, acids or harmful substances in the soil or runoff water. <\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Swedish Forest Agency<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2008<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Su\u00e8de<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-77\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fs.fed.us\/ne\/newtown_square\/publications\/technical_reports\/pdfs\/scanned\/OCR\/ne_gtr172.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Whole-tree Clearcutting in New England: Manager's. Guide to Impact on Soils, Streams, and Regeneration<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Intensively harvested forests in New England have shifted partially from conventional stem-only clearcutting using chainsaws and skidders to whole-tree clearcutting using harvesting machines. We have studied the impacts of whole- tree clearcutting on soil, water, and revegetation in spruce-fir, northern hardwood, and central hardwood forest types. This report summarizes the relevance of our findings to forest management and suggests various management considerations, guidelines, and further readings. The intended audience consists of practicing foresters, land managers, environmental protection agencies and organizations, and the general public.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Robert S. Pierce et al.\u00a0<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">1993<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Etats-Unis<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-78\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/hugepdf.com\/download\/la-recolte-raisonnee-des-remanents-en-foret_pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">La r\u00e9colte raisonn\u00e9e des r\u00e9manents en for\u00eat<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Dans la perspective d'une diversification des sources d'\u00e9nergie, les r\u00e9sidus d'exploitation (branches et feuillages) couramment appel\u00e9s r\u00e9manents constituent une ressource int\u00e9ressante jusqu'alors peu valoris\u00e9e. Toutefois, la r\u00e9colte r\u00e9p\u00e9t\u00e9e de ces produits n'est pas neutre et peut repr\u00e9senter une exportation d'\u00e9l\u00e9ments min\u00e9raux non n\u00e9gligeable. Elle peut entra\u00eener, sur certains types de sols, une baisse de la fertilit\u00e9 \u00e0 long terme, \u00e0 prohiber dans le cadre d'une sylviculture durable sans apport externe. \u00c0 partir de quels taux de r\u00e9colte et sur quels types de sols ? Ce guide tente d'y r\u00e9pondre en faisant la synth\u00e8se des recherches de l'INRA sur les cycles biog\u00e9ochimiques et en s'appuyant sur l'\u00e9valuation de quelques chantiers de r\u00e9colte suivis par l'UCFF et l'AFOCEL.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Emmanuel Cacot (coord.) Nicolas Eisner, Fran\u00e7ois Charnet, Pascal Leon, Croline Rantien , Jacques Ranger\u00a0<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2006<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">France<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Synth\u00e8se<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-79\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/data38.fcba.fr\/prosol\/VersionInternet_V02.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Pour une exploitation foresti\u00e8re respectueuse des sols et de la for\u00eat \"PROSOL\"<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Nous posons dans ce guide technique, d\u2019une part les fondamentaux concernant le sol forestier et les raisons de sa n\u00e9cessaire prise en compte dans les actes de gestion, et d\u2019autre part les syst\u00e8mes d\u2019exploitation avec les machines et accessoires utilis\u00e9s aujourd\u2019hui en France. Il donnera \u00e0 l\u2019ensemble des acteurs concern\u00e9s - propri\u00e9taires, gestionnaires, entreprises de travaux, soci\u00e9t\u00e9s d\u2019exploitation foresti\u00e8re, ouvriers forestiers - les informations n\u00e9cessaires \u00e0 un meilleur discernement des enjeux de chacun. Ce guide propose ainsi un diagnostic innovant pour d\u00e9terminer la sensibilit\u00e9 du sol au tassement et optimiser le choix du syst\u00e8me de r\u00e9colte. Il en d\u00e9coulera une meilleure organisation de la circulation des machines en for\u00eat.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Didier Pischedda (coord.) Michel Bartoli, Alain Br\u00e8thes, Emmanuel Cacot, Jean-Luc Chagnon, Xavrier Gauquelin, Manuel Nicolas, Didier Pischedda, Claudine Richter<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2009<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">France<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-80\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/us\/academic\/subjects\/earth-and-environmental-science\/soil-science\/biochar-regional-supply-chain-approach-view-climate-change-mitigation?format=HB\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">An integrated approach to assess sustainable forest biomass potentials at country level (chapter 6)<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Nutrient sustainability in context of whole - tree harvesting appeared to be an important constraint when considering how much biomass is realisable from fo rests. The attitude of private forest owners towards increased harvest of forest biomass is also of major importance for the realisable potential, given the small - scale structure of forest ownership in Austria.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Michael Englisch, Thomas Gschwantner, Thomas Ledermann and Klaus Katzensteiner\u00a0<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2017<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Autriche<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Livre<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-81\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/hal.inrae.fr\/hal-02596349\/file\/pub00034224.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Elaboration d'une grille d'\u00e9valuation multifonctionnelle des chantiers forestiers Bois-energie<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Soucieuses de \u00ab produire plus de bois en pr\u00e9servant mieux la biodiversit\u00e9 \u00bb ou de \u00ab dynamiser la fili\u00e8re -bois en prot\u00e9geant la biodiversit\u00e9 ordinaire et remarquable \u00bb, dialectique exprim\u00e9e par le Grenelle de l\u2019Environnement, les collectivit\u00e9s publiques souhaitent aujourd\u2019hui avoir un retour sur les impacts sociaux et environnementaux de leur politique d\u2019encouragement de la fili\u00e8re bois \u00e9nergie. Dans cet objectif, le pr\u00e9sent travail propose une grille d\u2019\u00e9valuation multifonctionnelle des chantiers forestiers produisant au moins pour partie du bois \u00e9nergie. <\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Florian Le Meur, Marc Fuhr, Emmanuel Cacot<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2011<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">France<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-82\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/hal.inrae.fr\/hal-02596349\/file\/pub00034224.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">A Review of Biomass Harvesting Best Management Practices Guidelines<br \/>\nNorth East State Foresters Association<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">The North East State Foresters Association (NEFA) conducted a thorough review of all the biomass harvesting guidelines that have been developed at the state level in the U.S., in other countries, and also within the existing forest certification systems.<br \/>\nMany states have some form of harvesting guidelines for protection of water quality (Best Management Practices or BMPs), but these do not usually cover biomass harvesting<br \/>\nexplicitly. Therefore, standard BMPs are not covered in this review.<br \/>\nIt is evident that peer reviewed scientific research forms the basis of the biomass harvesting guidelines that have been published to date, but only to a limit. The science has<br \/>\nrevealed areas where biomass harvesting must be conducted judiciously due to the fragile nature of the resource, but the research rarely provides a sure-bet metric to guide field harvesting activities.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\"><\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2012<\/td><td class=\"column-5\"><\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-83\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\">Guide de recommandations d'exploitation des menus bois en Franche Comt\u00e9<\/td><td class=\"column-2\">R\u00e9pondant \u00e0 une attente des propri\u00e9taires et des gestionnaires forestiers, l\u2019objectif de ce guide est d\u2019apporter des conseils afin de raisonner la r\u00e9colte des menus bois. Toutes les informations contenues dans chacune des fiches se concluent par des conseils de gestion donn\u00e9s aux propri\u00e9taires.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Anonyme<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2014<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">France<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-84\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\">Le bois-\u00e9nergie en Franche-Comt\u00e9. Guide au positionnement et \u00e0 l'action des associations.<\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Dans un contexte de d\u00e9veloppement de l\u2019utilisation du bois-\u00e9nergie en Franche-Comt\u00e9, il nous a paru important de produire un document, destin\u00e9 au r\u00e9seau associatif franc-comtois investi dans la protection de l\u2019environnement, permettant de situer les enjeux li\u00e9s \u00e0 l\u2019utilisation du bois-\u00e9nergie et de mettre en avant des propositions concr\u00e8tes afin que la ressource en bois et la biodiversit\u00e9 foresti\u00e8re soient pr\u00e9serv\u00e9s sur notre territoire.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Anonyme<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2014<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">France<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-85\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/uicn.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Energies_renouvelables_Bois-m6.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Bois-energie et biodiversit\u00e9 foresti\u00e8re<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Ce travail dresse dans un premier temps un \u00e9tat des lieux des for\u00eats et de leur biodiversit\u00e9 en France. Puis il d\u00e9veloppe les diff\u00e9rentes sources et techniques utilis\u00e9es pour r\u00e9colter et d\u00e9velopper le bois-\u00e9nergie. La derni\u00e8re partie de ce travail est consacr\u00e9e aux impacts potentiels sur la biodiversit\u00e9 que le Comit\u00e9 fran\u00e7ais de l'UICN recommande de prendre en compte dans le cadre du d\u00e9veloppement du bois-\u00e9nergie.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Marie Monmousseau\u00a0<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2015<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">France<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-86\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/dokumen.tips\/documents\/sustainable-woodfuel-harvesting-a-finnish-practical-sustainable-woodfuel-harvesting.html?page=1\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Sustainable Woodfuel Harvesting. Finnish Practical Applications\u00a0<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">The aim of this publication is to present basic principles and practical guidelines on how to ensure the sustainability of woodfuel harvesting operations in boreal forests. The guidelines are described on a relatively general level, so that they are more or less straightforwardly applicable to other European conditions. Since the EU 27 consists of such a diverse range of forest ecosystems, more detailed instructions suitable to particular circumstances should be established by national or regional institutions.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Martti Kuusinen\u00a0\u00a0<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2010<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Europe<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-87\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.for.gov.bc.ca\/ftp\/hfp\/external\/!publish\/FREP\/extension\/Chief%20Forester%20short%20CWD.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Chief Forester Guidance on Coarse Woody Debris Management<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">This document provides guidance for managing coarse woody debris on Crown forest land in British Columbia. The guidance is intended to inform resource professionals and is not binding on licensees or practitioners.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Anonyme<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2010<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Canada<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-88\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.for.gov.bc.ca\/hfd\/pubs\/Docs\/En\/En98.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Maintaining soil productivity in forest biomass chipping operations best management practices for soil conservation<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Forest harvesting operations that use portable chipping systems to generate biomass chips from logging residue are currently in use in British Columbia. Leaving deposits of residual materials after harvest has been completed can reduce productivity and affect soil hydrologic function. We summarize the research on the effects of chipped woody material accumulations, and then interpret these findings within the British Columbia context and provide guidance for best management practices to maintain long-term site productivity. <\/td><td class=\"column-3\">R., Kabzems, S. Dube, M. Curran, B. Chapman, S. Berch, G. Hope, M. Kranabetter, and C. Bulmer\u00a0<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2011<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Canada<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-89\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/open.alberta.ca\/dataset\/fb718a6b-beed-459c-a855-cf406e11c2ba\/resource\/1ae9b243-4c05-45db-8397-ae984ed585fe\/download\/2012-Alberta-Timber-Harvest-Planning-Operating-Ground-Rules-Framework-Renewal-2012-06.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Alberta timber harvest planning and operating ground rules framework for renewal<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">The Timber Harvest Planning and Operating Ground Rules provide direction to forest companies and government for planning, implementing and monitoring timber harvesting operations on timber disposition areas in Alberta. <\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development Forest Division Forest Management Branch -<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2012<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Canada<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-90\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cfs.nrcan.gc.ca\/publications?id=36067\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">La r\u00e9colte de biomasse foresti\u00e8re : saines pratiques et enjeux \u00e9cologiques dans la for\u00eat bor\u00e9ale canadienne<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">De nombreuses recherches portent actuellement sur les diff\u00e9rents aspects de la mise en \u0153uvre de la r\u00e9colte de biomasse foresti\u00e8re dans les for\u00eats bor\u00e9ales (techniques de r\u00e9colte, \u00e9quipement, transformation, produits, etc.). L\u2019\u00e9tude des impacts environnementaux du pr\u00e9l\u00e8vement des r\u00e9sidus forestiers est dor\u00e9navant, au m\u00eame titre que les aspects plus techniques, au c\u0153ur des pr\u00e9occupations des chercheurs, mais aussi de diff\u00e9rentes juridictions qui ont \u00e0 composer avec cette nouvelle pratique qui constitue un nouvel intrant sur le plan \u00e9conomique.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Evelyne Thiffault, Am\u00e9lie St-Laurent Samuel, Rut Serra<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2015<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Canada<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-91\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"http:\/\/environnement.wallonie.be\/publi\/dnf\/normes.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Normes de gestion pour favoriser la biodiversit\u00e9 dans les bois soumis au r\u00e9gime forestier<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Le but de ce document est de d\u00e9tailler et de pr\u00e9ciser les mesures sp\u00e9cifiques en faveur du d\u00e9veloppement de la biodiversit\u00e9 foresti\u00e8re pr\u00e9vues au chapitre 5 (4.2) de la circulaire n\u00b0 .2619 relative aux am\u00e9nagements dans les bois soumis au r\u00e9gime forestier. <\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Etienne Branquart, Sandrine li\u00e9geois\u00a0<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2012<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Belgique<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-92\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.for.gov.bc.ca\/hfd\/pubs\/docs\/tr\/TR081.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">A Compilation of Forest Biomass Harvesting and Related Policy in Canada<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">The main objective of this literature review is to summarize policies, includ- ing legislation, regulations and guidelines, related to the harvest of woody forest biomass in Canada. Discussion related to other aspects of forest biomass harvesting (e.g., economics, logistics, and ecological implications) is minimal in this paper since there are other many other excellent references on these topics.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Jean Roach, Shannon M. Berch<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2014<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Canada<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-93\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"http:\/\/norden.diva-portal.org\/smash\/get\/diva2:702651\/FULLTEXT01.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Increased biomass harvesting for bioenergy. Effects on biodiversity, landscape amenities and cultural heritage values\u00a0<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Bioenergy is one important form of renewable energy where Finland, Norway and Sweden have considerable potential. Greatly increased use of biomass for energy will, however, have considerable effects on environmental values like biodiversity, landscape appearance, outdoor recreation, and the cultural heritage. This review concludes that positive or marginally negative effects of biomass harvesting are likely for harvesting of logging residues, clearance of trees under power lines, along roads, and from marginal agricultural land, as well as production of energy crops on arable land. Negative effects are likely from harvesting of stumps, more intensive forest cultivation on logged areas, and harvesting of biomass from currently non-commercial forests. The environmental effects of production of biomass from reed canary grass or short rotation forestry will depend on where and how such production takes place. <\/td><td class=\"column-3\">H\u00e5kan Berglund, Erik Framstad, Vegard Gundersen, Raimo Heikkil\u00e4, Noora Lankinen, Taru Peltola, Ole Risb\u00f8l, Martin Weih<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2009<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Pays baltes et scandinaves<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Livre<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-94\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/forestry\/cpp028\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Stump Harvesting for Bioenergy \u2013 A Review of the Environmental Impacts<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Stump harvesting signifi es an intensification of forest management compared with conventional stem-only or above- ground biomass-only harvesting. There are many practical and perceived benefi ts of stump harvesting. These include (1) the production of woodfuel (2) fossil fuel substitution (3) additional revenue for forest owners (4) improved site preparation and (5) potential reduction of Heterobasidion . However, evidence suggests that, in the absence of appropriate precautionary measures, stump harvesting will lead to many undesirable environmental impacts.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">J.D. Walmsley and D.L. Godbold<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2010<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Royaume-Uni<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, Volume 83, Issue 1, January 2010, Pages 17\u201338<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-95\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/f2010243\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Consequences of More Intensive Forestry for the Sustainable Management of Forest Soils and Waters<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Here, we review and discuss some of the most pertinent questions related to how increased forest biomass production in Sweden could affect soils and surface waters, and how contemporary forestry goals can be met while minimizing the loss of other ecosystem services. We suggest that the development of management plans to promote the sustainable use of soil resources and water quality, while maximizing biomass production, will require a holistic ecosystem approach that is placed within a broader landscape perspective.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Hjalmar Laudon, Ryan A. Sponseller, Richard W. Lucas, Martyn N. Futter, Gustaf Egnell, Kevin Bishop, Anneli \u00c5gren, Eva Ring and Peter H\u00f6gberg\u00a0<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2011<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Pays baltes et scandinaves<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Forests 2011, 2(1), 243-260<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-96\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/conservancy.umn.edu\/bitstream\/handle\/11299\/107767\/200.pdf?sequence=1\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Tools to Minimize the Impacts of Energy Wood Harvesting on the Environment and Soil Productivity in Minnesota<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">This report is one of several being prepared as part of an international effort to enhance the understanding of the status and relevant issues associated with woody biomass harvesting, as well as methods to minimize adverse biomass harvesting impacts on the environm ent and, notably, soil productivity.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Anna L. Robertson, Michael A. Kilgore et Alan R. Ek\u00a0<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2008<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Etats-Unis<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-97\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/chapter\/10.1007\/978-1-4020-5054-1_7#page-1\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Review of recommendations for forest energy harvesting and wood ash recycling: chapter 7<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">The existing recommendations and information materials cover a wide range of topics including economic, ecological, environmental, social, technical and practical aspects for the whole forest fuel chain, ranging from available and potential resources, silviculture and production in the forest, harvesting technology, processing, handling, storage and transport to fuel quality, combustion technology, and emissions from the energy plant. In addition, waste production, wood ash recycling to the forest and institutional and participatory aspects are covered (Stupak et al. 2007).<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Inge Stupak, Antti Asikainen, Dominik R\u00f6ser et Karri Pasanen<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2008<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Pays baltes et scandinaves<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Livre<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-98\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/abs\/pii\/S0961953407001250\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Effects on biodiversity of forest fuel extraction, governed by processes working on a large scale<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">The question whether forest fuel extraction will affect biodiversity is ultimately a question of whether there will be species extinctions due to this practice. Quantitative predictions, i.e. about how much habitat loss various species can tolerate, therefore require knowledge about processes that work over hundreds of square kilometres and over several years. Therefore, they are almost impossible to make. Instead, qualitative recommendations about which types of habitats or wood types that have the most threatened fauna and flora can be made based on information about landscape history and microhabitat associations of red-listed species. For Sweden a general conclusion for forest fuel extraction based mainly on saproxylic beetles is that coniferous wood can be harvested as forest fuel to a rather large extent, whereas deciduous tree species, and especially southern deciduous species and aspen, should be retained to a larger degree. <\/td><td class=\"column-3\">M. Jonsell\u00a0<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2007<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Pays baltes et scandinaves<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Acte de colloque<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-99\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/ucanr.edu\/sites\/forestry\/files\/161616.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Potential posivite and negative environemental impacts of increased woody biomass use for California<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">This report reviews the published literature relevant to the potential environmental impacts of increased woody biomass use for energy generation in California and identifies information gaps that exist in understanding those impacts. <\/td><td class=\"column-3\">William Stewart, Robert F. Powers, Kathyrn McGown, Lindsay Chiono, Teresa Chuang\u00a0<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2011<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Etats-Unis<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-100\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.for.gov.bc.ca\/hfd\/library\/documents\/Berch_etal_2011.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Intensive forest biomass harvesting and biodiversity in Canada: A summary of relevant issues<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">In this paper, we summarized the biodiversity-focused content of the workshop, including potential implications of intensification of biomass removal on biodiversity, knowledge gaps identified by workshop participants, and implications for policy development. Woody debris represents an important habitat resource for a wide variety of forest organisms, and the presence and continued supply of fresh to highly decayed dead wood represents a key concern in managed forest systems.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Shannon M. Berch, Dave Morris, Jay Malcolm\u00a0<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2011<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Canada<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-101\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cdnsciencepub.com\/doi\/abs\/10.1139\/x2012-078#.V9wVBzUnWM0\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Effects of fuelwood on biodiversity - a review focused on the situation in Europe<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">La demande d\u2019\u00e9nergie sans cesse croissante et les pr\u00e9occupations au sujet des changements climatiques, des \u00e9missions de gaz \u00e0 effet de serre et du pic p\u00e9trolier ont incit\u00e9 les pays \u00e0 \u00e9laborer des politiques qui favorisent les \u00e9nergies renouvelables, incluant la bio\u00e9nergie bas\u00e9e sur la for\u00eat. En Europe, les changements en foresterie motiv\u00e9s par la production de bois de chauffage vont sans doute avoir un impact sur les conditions de l\u2019habitat pour la biodiversit\u00e9 foresti\u00e8re. Nous avons fait une revue syst\u00e9matique de la litt\u00e9rature, bas\u00e9e sur 88 articles, pour faire la synth\u00e8se des r\u00e9sultats de la recherche et des lacunes dans l\u2019\u00e9tat de nos connaissances <\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Christophe Bouet, Aurore Lassauce, Mats Jonsell\u00a0<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2012<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Europe<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-102\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/publication\/270474169_Biomass_Harvesting_and_Soil_Productivity_Is_the_Science_Meeting_our_Policy_Needs\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Biomass Harvesting and Soil Productivity: Is the Science Meeting our Policy Needs?<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Biomass harvesting and associated management practices increase the availability of forest-based feedstocks for emerging bioproduct and energy markets. Concerns about the sustainability of these practices have led to the development of biomass harvesting guidelines (BHGs) by state, national, and international agencies and nongovernmental organizations. Site productivity BHG provisions include retaining specific proportions of harvested residues and restricting biomass harvesting on some sites.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Eric D. Vance, W. Michael Aust, Brian D. Strahm, Robert E. Froese Robert B. Harrison, Larry A. Morris\u00a0<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2014<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Etats-Unis<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Acte de colloque<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-103\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"http:\/\/147.100.164.84\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/Rapport-final-Resobio-2014-06-28.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Projet Resobio. Gestion des r\u00e9manents forestiers : pr\u00e9servation des sols et de la biodiversit\u00e9<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Le projet RESOBIO \u2013 \u00ab Gestion des R\u00e9manents forestiers : pr\u00e9servation des sols et de la biodiversit\u00e9 \u00bb, soutenu par l\u2019ADEME et le Minist\u00e8re en charge de l\u2019agriculture, de l\u2019agroalimentaire et de la for\u00eat, a pour double objectif (i) d\u2019actualiser les connaissances disponibles au niveau international \u2013 avec un focus sur les zones temp\u00e9r\u00e9es \u2013 sur les cons\u00e9quences potentielles du pr\u00e9l\u00e8vement des r\u00e9manents forestiers dans le domaine de la fertilit\u00e9 et de la biodiversit\u00e9 et (ii) d\u2019identifier les pistes de recommandations pour une r\u00e9vision du guide de l\u2019ADEME (2006) sur la \u00ab r\u00e9colte raisonn\u00e9e des r\u00e9manents en for\u00eat \u00bb. Le th\u00e8me de la biodiversit\u00e9 n\u2019\u00e9tait pas couvert par ce guide. <\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Landmann et al\u00a0<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2014<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Monde<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-104\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/publication\/282847060_Gestion_des_remanents_forestiers_preservation_des_sols_et_de_la_biodiversite_Synthese_de_l'etude_RESOBIO\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Gestion des r\u00e9manents forestiers : pr\u00e9servation des sols et de la biodiversit\u00e9. Synth\u00e8se de l'\u00e9tude Resobio<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">la pr\u00e9sente synth\u00e8se r\u00e9sume les r\u00e9sultats de ce tra vail sur (i) la nature des bois utilis\u00e9s (et parmi eux les r\u00e9manents) pour la production d\u2019\u00e9nergie, (i i) les cons\u00e9quences de ce type de pr\u00e9l\u00e8vement pour la fertilit\u00e9 des sols (y compris les possibilit\u00e9s de fertilisation compensatoire, notamment par les cendres de bois), et (iii) les cons\u00e9quences pou r la biodiversit\u00e9. <\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Landmann et al\u00a0<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2015<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Monde<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-105\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/abs\/pii\/S0378112715001814\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Quantifying consequences of removing harvesting residues on forest soils and tree growth \u2013 A meta-analysis<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">The main objective of the present study was to compile published data worldwide and to quantify the overall effects of removing harvesting residues on nutrient outputs, chemical and biological soil fertility and tree growth, through a meta-analysis. Our study showed that, compared with conventional stem-only harvest, removing the stem plus the harvesting residues generally increases nutrient outputs thereby leading to reduced amounts of total and available nutrients in soils and soil acidification, particularly when foliage is harvested along with the branches.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">David Achat, Christine Deleuze, Guy Landmann, No\u00e9mie Pousse, Jacques Ranger, Laurent Augusto\u00a0<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2015<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">France<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Forest Ecology and Management<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-106\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/publication\/283789309_Potential_Ecological_Consequences_of_Forest_Biomass_Harvesting_in_California\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Potential ecological consequences of biomass harvesting in California<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">The expansion of forest biomass markets may affect California\u2019s forests both positively and negatively. Existing research does not permit an exact assessment of biomass harvesting impact in each forest type, but policy decisions can still benefit from a synthesis of the available science. Biomass markets may permit the harvest and removal of trees that would previously have been left in the woods to die, so they may reduce the prevalence of key habitat elements such as snags and downed logs. Water quality, soils, and site productivity can also be affected by reductions in dead wood brought about by increased biomass harvesting.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Alexander M. Evans\u00a0<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2015<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Etats-Unis<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Journal of Sustainable Forestry<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-107\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/publication\/283789309_Potential_Ecological_Consequences_of_Forest_Biomass_Harvesting_in_California\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Sustainable Criteria and Indicators for Solid Bioenergy from Forests<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">This outcome paper aims to bring together and summarize ideas expressed by the participants in the Joint Workshops in order to propose a set of criteria and indicators for solid bioenergy from forests. Both the most relevant scientific literature and the state-of-the-art at different levels (forestry perspective, various certification schemes and countries initiatives) were considered in order to develop this proposal.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Uwe R. Fritsche, Leire Iriarte, Johnny de Jong, Elke van Thuijl, Emma Lammers, Alessandro Agostini, Nicolae Scarlat<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2012<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Europe<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-108\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/epdf\/10.1002\/wene.3\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Principles of nutrient managementfor sustainable forest bioenergyproduction<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Nutrient management is an important part of ensuring sustainable forest produc-tion. Essential concepts for managing site nutrients are built on the knowledge oftypes of soil, tree nutrient demands, and how these are impacted by silviculture,harvesting, and other management practices. Managers must clearly define forestmanagement objectives, and how bioenergy production or carbon dioxide-offsetobjectives require special consideration. Managers must examine how silviculture, harvesting, and other management practices might affect nutrient poolsand availability. Soil fertility management practices are designed in response tothese evaluation steps. Fertility management alternatives may include alteringmanagement practices that affect the distribution of harvested tree branches, fo-liage, and tops, as well as addition of fertilizers, nitrogen-fixing plants, or woodash. Planting on sites with pre-existing nutrient deficiencies may require addingnutrients to obtain merchantable tree growth over the short and long term. Nu-trient management principles may also be required to minimize off-site impactsof management practices, for example, on water quality or climate change. Man-agers must determine what nutrients are needed on forested sites, amendmentrates, and timing, and take into account the relationships among nutrients, soil,climate, and plant processes throughout the rotation. Soil and foliar analysis andthe use of soil and plant bioassay tools can assist in these evaluations. Sustainablemanagement practices require that nutrient control strategies evaluate economicand energy balances, and if necessary, modify management practices, includingnutrient amendments, to ensure that they are sustainable. Examples of forestnutrient management practices are described.C<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">D. Mead, C. Smith <\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2012<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Europe<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-109\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"http:\/\/docplayer.fr\/5379561-Guide-pratique-pour-la-gestion-durable-des-forets-certifiees-pefc-en-region-wallonne.html\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Guide pratique pour la Gestion durable des for\u00eats certifi\u00e9es PEFC en r\u00e9gion Wallonne<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Ce guide d\u2019aide \u00e0 la mise en \u0153uvre de la charte s\u2019adresse \u00e0 tous les propri\u00e9taires et gestionnaires forestiers qui ont sign\u00e9 la charte pefc pour une gestion durable des for\u00eats il a pour objectif d\u2019expliciter de mani\u00e8re plus pr\u00e9cise le contenu des engagements de la charte et de sugg\u00e9rer quelques pistes de r\u00e9flexion pour valoriser nos for\u00eats conform\u00e9ment aux principes de gestion durable. Ce guide est \u00e9galement riche en r\u00e9f\u00e9rences bibliographiques et en sites internet qui permettront aux utilisateurs de ce guide de trouver un compl\u00e9ment d\u2019information \u00e0 leurs questions.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Anonyme<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2007<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Belgique<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-110\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"http:\/\/docplayer.fr\/12110319-Cahier-des-charges-national-pour-le-proprietaire-forestier.html\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Annexe 6 : Cahier des charges national pour le propri\u00e9taire forestier\u00a0<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Ce document d\u00e9finit les exigences nationales PEFC s\u2019appliquant au propri\u00e9taire forestier en France. Il est le r\u00e9sultat d\u2019une r\u00e9flexion nationale associant tous les acteurs impliqu\u00e9s dans la fili\u00e8re for\u00eat-bois. Il est assorti d\u2019un programme d\u2019accompagnement mis en \u0153uvre par l\u2019entit\u00e9 d\u2019acc\u00e8s \u00e0 la certification PEFC (EAC) dont le propri\u00e9taire adh\u00e9rent d\u00e9pend territorialement, et visant \u00e0 aider les propri\u00e9taires dans l\u2019application des engagements \u00e9nonc\u00e9s ci-dessous. <\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Anonyme<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2012<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">France<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-111\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ieabioenergy.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/IEA-Bioenergy-Update-22-Task-31-Certification-of-Forest-Fuel-Production.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Certification of Forest Fuel Production Systems: a Solution for Sustainable Use of Biomass from Forest Residues for Energy<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">This paper offers a preliminary analysis of criteria to incorporate in a certification procedure for forest energy, a procedure that may remove some of the barriers that prevent increased use of biomass for energy in many regions of the world today.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">J. Richardson, R. Bj\u00f6rheden et C.T. Smith\u00a0<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2005<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Irlande<\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Rapport<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-112\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S0961953407001195\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Sustainable utilisation of forest biomass for energy\u2014Possibilities and problems: Policy, legislation, certification, and recommendations and guidelines in the Nordic, Baltic, and other European countries<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">The substitution of biomass for fossil fuels in energy consumption is a measure to mitigate global warming, as well as having other advantages. Political action plans for increased use exist at both European and national levels. This paper briefly reviews the contents of recommendations, guidelines, and other synthesis publications on sustainable use of forest biomass for energy. Topics are listed and an overview of advantages, disadvantages, and trade-offs between them is given, from the viewpoint of society in general and the forestry and energy sectors in particular. For the Nordic and Baltic countries, the paper also identifies the extent to which wood for energy is included in forest legislation and forest certification standards under the \u201cProgramme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification\u201d (PEFC) and the \u201cForest Stewardship Council\u201d (FSC) schemes.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">I. Stupak, A. Asikainen, , M. Jonsell, E. Karltun, , A. Lunnan, D. Mizarait\u0117, K. Pasanen, , H. P\u00e4rng, , K. Raulund-Rasmussen, D. R\u00f6ser, , M. Schroeder, , I. Varnagiryt\u0117, , L. Vilkriste, , I. Callesen, i, N. Clarke, , T. Gaitnieks, M. Ingerslev, , M. Mandre, , R. Ozolincius , A. Saarsalmi, , K. Armolaitis, H.-S. Helmisaari, , A. Indriksons, , L. Kairiukstis, , K. Katzensteiner, , M. Kukkola, K. Ots, H.P. Ravn, P. Tamminen -\u00a0<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2007<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Europe<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Biomass and Bioenergy (Vol. 31, Issue 10, pp. 666-684)<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-113\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S096195341000423X\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest fuel production and harvesting: A review of current standards for sustainable forest management<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">International processes and certification systems have been developed to ensure sustainable forest management (SFM) in general, but it is important to consider if they adequately address specific impacts of intensified production and harvesting methods related to forest fuels. To explore how existing SFM frameworks address sustainable forest fuel production, criteria and indicators (C&amp;I) from 10 different international processes and organizations and 157 international, national and sub-national forest management certification standards under the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) and the Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC) were reviewed. International processes include indicators that require identification or reporting of availability, harvested amounts, value, or share in energy consumption of forest fuels. Forest certification standards address several specific woodfuel issues, but not always in a consistent manner.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Inge Stupak, Brenna Lattimore, Brian D. Titus, C. Tattersall Smith\u00a0<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2011<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">\u00a0<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Biomass and Bioenergy (Vol. 35, Issue 8, pp. 3287-3308)<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-114\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S0961953408000147\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Overview of recent developments in sustainable biomass certification<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">The objective of this paper is to give a comprehensive review of initiatives on biomass certification from different viewpoints of stakeholders, including national governments (such as The Netherlands, the UK, Belgium and Germany), the EC, NGOs, companies, and international bodies up until October 2007. Furthermore, opportunities and restrictions in the development of biomass certification are described, including international trade law limitations, lack of adequate methodologies, stakeholder involvement requirements and certification costs.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Jinke van Dam, Martin Junginger, Andr\u00e9 Faaij, Ingmar J\u00fcrgens, Gustavo Best, Uwe Fritsche\u00a0<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2008<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Europe<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">Biomass and Bioenergy (Vol. 32, Issue 8, pp. 749-780)<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-115\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/abs\/10.1080\/14942119.2012.10739958\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Provincial Government Standards, Criteria, and Indicators for Sustainable Harvest of Forest Biomass in British Columbia: Soil and Biodiversity<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">An increasing amount of biomass is being harvested from British Columbia\u2019s forests as a feedstock for bioenergy, and these removals have the potential to incrementally increase machine traffic and organic matter removals from forest sites, compared to harvesting operations focused solely on roundwood for timber or pulp. To the extent that existing standards support SFM, they may be sufficient for ensuring that biomass harvesting is also sustainable. Regardless of the new challenges created by intensive harvesting practices, the principles of soil and biodiversity conservation remain the same. The current framework for BC\u2019s SFM policy is reviewed to examine whether it addresses the major sustainability issues that are likely to arise in the province if intensive biomass harvesting becomes more prevalent. We conclude that intensification of biomass removals will require us to keep focused on stand and landscape sensitivity to coarse woody debris removals and biodiversity requirements, nutrient removals, and cumulative soil disturbance<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Shannon M. Berch, Chuck Bulmer, Mike Curran, Maija Finvers, Brian Titus\u00a0<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2011<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Canada<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">International Journal of Forest Engineering (Vol. 23, 2012, Issue 1)<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Article scientifique<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-116\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/helda.helsinki.fi\/bitstream\/handle\/10138\/314551\/Helmisaari_H_S._Vanguelova_E._eds._2013._Forest_Bioenergy_and_Soil_Sustainability_Workshop_Proceedings.pdf?sequence=1\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Proceedings of the Workshop W6.1 Forest bioenergy and soil sustainability at EUROSOIL Congress 2nd July to 6th July 2012, Bari, Italy<\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\">The main product of the Workshop will be a review on national guidelines for sustainable forest bioenergy use for long term soil and forest sustainability.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Helj\u00e4-Sisko Helmisaari et Elena Vanguelova<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">2013<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">Europe<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">OECD<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Actes<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-117\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=&amp;esrc=s&amp;source=web&amp;cd=&amp;ved=2ahUKEwjh4NrCvvP4AhUUbRoKHYnJDNIQFnoECAYQAQ&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mdpi.com%2F2071-1050%2F12%2F14%2F5667%2Fpdf&amp;usg=AOvVaw3kRKu9uLqApzPtYuoLQ9_L\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><\/a><\/td><td class=\"column-2\"><\/td><td class=\"column-3\"><\/td><td class=\"column-4\"><\/td><td class=\"column-5\"><\/td><td class=\"column-6\"><\/td><td class=\"column-7\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<!-- #tablepress-5 from cache -->\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Une base de donn\u00e9es bibliographiques concernant la r\u00e9colte des r\u00e9manents est disponible ici. Les r\u00e9f\u00e9rences retenues couvrent\u00a0: La majorit\u00e9 des ressources concerne la p\u00e9riode 2007-2017. Pour identifier un document, utilisez le formulaire suivant :<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-90","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.gip-ecofor.org\/gerboise\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.gip-ecofor.org\/gerboise\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.gip-ecofor.org\/gerboise\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.gip-ecofor.org\/gerboise\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.gip-ecofor.org\/gerboise\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=90"}],"version-history":[{"count":26,"href":"http:\/\/www.gip-ecofor.org\/gerboise\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":734,"href":"http:\/\/www.gip-ecofor.org\/gerboise\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90\/revisions\/734"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.gip-ecofor.org\/gerboise\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=90"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.gip-ecofor.org\/gerboise\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=90"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.gip-ecofor.org\/gerboise\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=90"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}