Une base de données bibliographiques concernant la récolte des rémanents est disponible ici. Les 80 références retenues couvrent :
- les guides pratiques français, ciblés entièrement (Guide ADEME 2006) ou partiellement sur la question des rémanents ;
- les guides pratiques étrangers individuels (nationaux en général), et des synthèses (anglo-saxonnes principalement) de différents guides ;
- une sélection de références sur la certification en lien avec la récolte de bois pour l’énergie ;
- une sélection de rapports et d’articles de synthèses sur les impacts environnementaux de la récolte de bois pour l’énergie.
La majorité des ressources concerne la période 2007-2017.
Pour identifier un document, utilisez le formulaire suivant :
| Titre | Résumé | Auteurs | Année | Emprunte géographique | Journal / édition | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ecological and environmental concerns of the forest biomass use for energy production. Acritical review of the current situation | The present report highlights the possible ecological and environmental constraints that will be encountered when harvesting biomass from existing forests. Some of the constraints presented in this report were identified not in research targeted at biomass harvest. However the results are valid for this use. | Máthé László, Duncan Pollard | 2005 | European environment agency | ||
| Recent developments of biofuels/bioenergy sustainability certification: A global overview | The objective of this paper is to provide a review on the latest developments on the main initiatives and approaches for the sustainability certification for biofuels and/or bioenergy. A large number of national and international initiatives lately experienced rapid development in the view of the biofuels and bioenergy targets announced in the European Union, United States and other countries worldwide. | Nicolae Scarlat , Jean-François Dallemand - | 2011 | Monde | Energy Policy | Article scientifique |
| Missouri Woody BiomassHarvesting. Best Management Practices Manuel | This booklet has been prepared to inform forest owners, loggers, foresters and other interested persons about woody biomass harvesting best management practices (BMPs). These BMPs provide recommendations designed to protect the forest that the citizens of Missouri rely on for jobs, clean air and water, diverse wildlife habitat, scenic beauty, outdoor recreation and tourism. | Doug Enyart; Dr. Francisco Aguilar; Dr. Bill Kurtz; Rosanna Hernandez | 2010 | Etats-Unis | Missouri Department of Conservation | Rapport |
| Forest Biomass Retention and Harvesting Guidelines for the Northeast | These guidelines are based on the Forest Guild’s principles. Forest Guild members are concerned with reconciling biomass removals with the principles of excellent forestry— forestry that is ecologically, economically, and socially responsible. | Bob Perschel; Alexander Evans; Mike DeBonis | 2010 | Etats-Unis | Forest Guild | Rapport |
| Michigan Woody Biomass Harvesting Guidance | The purpose of the WBHG is to provide a broad context for harvesting woody biomass from forest land within a sustainable forest management framework, as well as specific technical recommendations. It is expected that this guidance will be revised as research, practices, science, technology, practical experience, and knowledge add to the understanding of woody biomass harvesting/processing in a forest setting. | Jennifer M. Granholm Rebecca A. Humphries | 2010 | Etats-Unis | Michigan DNRE | Rapport |
| A Guide to Forest Biomass Harvesting and Retention in Maryland | These guidelines are based on a comprehensive review of the potential ecological risks associated with biomass harvesting and a review of Maryland’s existing forest management programs. It should be noted that many of the recommended practices contained within this document are standard forest management operations, whereas other practices contained herein may be new to many. | Brian A. Kittler ; Christopher M. Beauvais | 2010 | Etats-Unis | Pinchot institute | Rapport |
| Recommendations for the Harvesting of Woody Biomass | The following recommendations are offered to assist landowners, loggers and the users of woody biomass in making sound decisions regarding biomass harvesting and removal while ensuring the sustainability of the forest resources. | 2011 | Etats-Unis | Fiche d'information | ||
| Forests and water. UK forestry standard guidelines | Forests and Water is one of a series of seven Guidelines that support the United Kingdom Forestry Standard (UKFS). The UKFS and Guidelines outline the context for forestry in the UK, set out the approach of the UK governments to sustainable forest management, define standards and requirements, and provide a basis for regulation and monitoring – including national and international reporting. | 2011 | Royaume-Uni | Forestry commission | Rapport | |
| Protéger et valoriser l'eau forestière. Guide pratique national réalisé dans le cadre du programme"EAU + FOR" | Son objectif : préserver l’eau forestière destinée à la consommation humaine. Cela nécessite de concilier protection de la ressource en eau et production de bois. Pour atteindre ce but, il faut améliorer la compréhension des enjeux forêt et eau en facilitant la concertation entre acteurs et en appliquant des recommandations forestières adaptées. | Aurélien Bansept, Julien Fiquerpron | 2014 | France | FPF; FBF; CNPF | Livre |
| Bois-énergie : maîtriser les impacts | S’il est d’une brûlante actualité, le bois-énergie n’est pas une nouveauté. Souvenons-nous : les débuts de l’ère industrielle, la surexploitation des taillis, la dégradation sévère et persistante des sols fragiles… Raisonnons aujourd’hui en termes de gestion durable et préservons, entre autres, les sols. | Jacques Ranger, Caroline Rantien, Alain Brethes, Patrice Mengin-Lecreulx et Thierry Sardin | 2007 | France | Rendez-vous techniques de l'ONF | Article |
| Ökologische Grenzen der Biomassenutzung in Wäldern | Die Forstwirtschaft kann die steigende Nachfrage nach Holz und Biomasse nur durch höhere Nutzungen abdecken, beispielsweise durch Ganz- baumnutzung. Unter dem Gesichtspunkt einer Nachhaltigkeit der Hauptnährstoffvorräte im Waldboden ergibt sich jedoch die Forderung: Die Nadel- und Blattmasse, wenn möglich auch das Feinreisig, sollen im Wald verbleiben. | Michael English | 2007 | Autriche | BFW | Article |
| Potenziale und Restriktionen der Biomassenutzung im Wald | Einer der in der forstlichen Diskussion unserer Tage meistverwendeten Begriffe ist das Nutzungspotenzial. Nicht nur die Ergebnisse der zweiten Bundeswaldinventur, auch die Entwicklung neuer Märkte für die Verwer - tung schwächerer Sortimente und Reisig geben Anreize zur vermehrten Nutzung von Holz und Biomasse. | Karl Josef Meiwes, Norbert Asche, Joachim Block, Reinhard Kallweit, Christian Kölling, Gerhard Raben, Klaus von Wilper | 2008 | Autriche | AFZ-DerWald | Article |
| Mieux intégrer la biodiversité dans la gestion forestière | Ce guide s'adresse aux professionnels de la forêt, mais également aux propriétaires forestiers publics et privés pour leur apporter les éclairages utiles sur la manière de mieux prendre en compte l'écologie dans la gestion durable de leur forêt. | Marion Gosselin, Yoan Paillet | 2010 | France | Quae | Livre |
| Managing deadwood in forests and woodlands | This Guide has been written for woodland owners and managers who want to know where and how to manage woodlands for deadwood – to help improve forest condition and fulfil objectives for sustainable forest management and the UK Biodiversity Action Plan. | Jonathan Humphrey et Sallie Bailey | 2012 | Royaume-Uni | Forestry commission | Rapport |
| Forest Harvesting and the Environment Guidelines | The forest harvesting and the environment guidelines have been developed through extensive consultation with a wide range of relevant parties. They set out sound and practical measures based on the principles of Sustainable Forest Management (SFM), and are firmly rooted in the best available scientific information. The guidelines will be kept under review to facilitate amendment in the light of new research findings. | DEPARTMENT OF THE MARINE AND NATURAL RESOURCES DUBLIN IRL FOREST SERVICE | 2000 | Ireland | DEPARTMENT OF THE MARINE AND NATURAL RESOURCES DUBLIN IRL FOREST SERVICE | Rapport |
| Increased biomass harvesting for bioenergy. Effects on biodiversity, landscape amenities and cultural heritage values | The overall objective for this review is to present a coherent overview of current knowledge on the effects of biomass harvesting for the purpose of bioenergy on biodiversity, landscape amenities (especially outdoor recreation), and cultural heritage values in Fennoscandia. | Erik Framstad (ed.) Håkan Berglund, Vegard Gundersen, Raimo Heikkilä, Noora Lankinen, Taru Peltola, Ole Risbøl, and Martin Weih - | 2009 | Pays baltes et scandinaves | norden | Rapport |
| Considerations and Recommendations for Retaining Woody Biomass on Timber Harvest Sites in Maine | The objective of this report is to recommend guidelines for retention of woody biomass on harvest sites from a general perspective (Section 3) and with respect to soil productivity (Section 4), water quality (Section 5), and site-level biodiversity (Section 6). Background information is provided on each topic based on a review of relevant scientific literature and harvesting guidelines from other states with similar forest types and markets. | Jeffrey G. Benjamin | 2010 | Etats-Unis | The University of Maine | Rapport |
| Sustainable Biomass Retention and Harvesting Guidelines | As this edition of Forest Wisdom demonstrates, using biomass for energy presents a suite of complex technical and social issues. Sound science and public policy is needed to both protect natural resources and make informed renewable energy decisions. The Forest Guild recognizes these complexities and is a leader in addressing the ecological sustainability of biomass harvesting and utilization. At the same time, we understand that there are valid ecological and economic reasons to use biomass for energy and that these benefits need to be considered in the broader biomass dialogue. | Marcia Summers | 2011 | Etats-Unis | communication | |
| An Analysis of Woody Biomass Harvesting Guidelines (BHGs) for North Carolina Forestry | The goal of this paper is to aid North Carolina’s best management practices technical committee in the development of guidelines for the sustainable harvest of woody biomass in the state. | Brunell Gugelmann | 2011 | Etats-Unis | Rapport | |
| Sustainable Woody Biomass Harvesting: Minimizing Impacts | 2019 | |||||
| Forest Biomass Harvesting Recommendations: A Supplement to South Carolina’s Best Management Practices for Forestry | These recommendations are intended to supplement South Carolina’s Best Management Practices for Forestry in situations where more woody material is removed than during traditional forestry operations. | Etats-Unis | Rapport | |||
| Forest Biomass Retention and Harvesting. Guidelines for the Southeast | Guidelines for ensuring forests can support wildlife, maintain biodiversity, provide clean water, sequester carbon, protect forest soil productivity, and continue to produce income after a biomass harvest or repeated harvests. | Forest Guild Southeast Biomass Working Group | 2012 | Etats-Unis | Rapport | |
| Forest Biomass Retention and Harvesting Guidelines for the Pacific Northwest | Biomass Retention and Harvesting Guidelines The Forest Guild developed these biomass retention and harvesting guidelines for foresters who put the highest priority on maintenance and enhancement of the entire forest ecosystem. Where economic objectives are paramount, we hope these guidelines also add val e, because maintenance of ecosystem function through retention of dead wood is important for long-term forest health. Our focus is not the destination of the wood or biomass removed, but the condition of the forest after harvest. | Forest Guild Pacific Northwest Biomass Working Group | 2013 | Etats-Unis | Rapport | |
| Utilisation durable du bois-énergie dans le Benelux. Quelques bonnes pratiques | Ce document s’adresse aux personnes impliquées dans la production d’énergie ou toute autre utilisation de la biomasse provenant du bois (les produits chimiques, les carburants de seconde et troisième génération) et/ou de l’approvisionnement du secteur (production et récolte de bois). Le contenu a été élaboré pour des lecteurs qui réfléchissent et agissent déjà selon les principes de gestion durable et qui veulent exploiter la biomasse bois comme une matière première locale, écologique et renouvelable, que ce soit pour des applications énergétiques ou autres. | Marc Naessens et al. | 2011 | Benelux | Fiche d'information | |
| Recommendations for the extraction of forest fuel and compensation fertilising | The recommendations below outline how th e National Board of Forestry, Sweden considers the extraction of forest fuels and compensation fertilising should be conducted in order to avoid any undesirable effects on the nutritional balance in the soil, on the biological diversity and the water quality in lakes, watercourses and water tables, and also to avoid any net flow of noxious substances (e.g. heavy metals) into the soil. | Hans Samuelsson | 2002 | Suède | ||
| Whole-tree Harvesting. A guide to good practice | This guide provides operational guidance to managers on the potential impacts of whole-tree harvesting upon the forest ecosystem. It also considers the likely risks on different sites and makes recommendations for managers faced with different harvesting options. | T. Nisbet, J. Dutch and A. Moffat | 1997 | Royaume-Uni | Rapport | |
| Stump Harvesting: Interim Guidance on Site Selection and Good Practice | The guidance is largely based on expert judgement of the scientific issues informed by practical experience of managing forest soils. Uncertainties remain about the long-term sustainability of stump harvesting on certain soil types, which will require new research to quantify impacts and check that the guidance is fit for purpose | Anonyme | 2009 | Royaume-Uni | Rapport | |
| Guidance on site selection for brash removal | The existing guidance classifies a large part of the forest estate as being potentially sensitive to the removal of brash, leading to a shortage of suitable sites. This has prompted a re-examination of the original criteria for defining sensitive soils and waters. | Anonyme | 2009 | Royaume-Uni | Rapport | |
| Energy from woody biomass: a review of harvesting guidelines and a discussion of related challenges | In some regions, including several U.S. states, guidelines have been developed for removal of woody biomass from forested areas. similarly, guidelines for removal of agricultural residues, in anticipation of commercialization of cellulosic ethanol and other fuels, have been developed. This report provides a brief overview of forest biomass harvesting guidelines and their importance in the United States and other reg ions of the world. | Kathryn Fernholz, Steve Bratkovich, Jim Bowyer, Alison Lindurgh | 2009 | Etats-Unis | Rapport | |
| Chapter 11: Existing State Woody Biomass Harvesting Guidelines | This chapter will review the common themes identified in Evans et al. (2010) and found within the existing state woody biomass harvesting guidelines. A brief discussion of the experiences in Canada and northern Europe is also included. Six states have functioning woody biomass harvesting guidelines, and several more are beginning the process of guideline development. California regulators may find a review of these existing woody biomass harvesting guidelines informative as they begin the guideline development process. Understanding the ecological and economic differences between California and the states with existing guidelines will be important so that recommendations found in other state guidelines can be evaluated within the context of California’s environment | William Stewart, Robert F. Powers, Kathryn McGown, Lindsay Chiono, Teresa Chuang | 2011 | Etats-Unis | Rapport | |
| A Review of Biomass Harvesting Best Management Practices Guidelines | The North East State Foresters Association (NEFA) conducted a thorough review of all the biomass harvesting guidelines that have been developed at the state level in the U.S., in other countries, and also within the existing forest certification systems. Many states have some form of harvesting guidelines for protection of water quality (Best Management Practices or BMPs), but these do not usually cover biomass harvesting explicitly. Therefore, standard BMPs are not covered in this review. | Anonyme | 2012 | Etats-Unis | Rapport | |
| Overview of Forest Biomass Harvesting Guidelines | Evans, Kittler, Perschel | 2012 | ||||
| State Issues Guidelines for Forest Biomass Harvesting. Surging Interest in Biomass Spurs Concern for Soil, Water, and Habitat | In light of the increasing demand for wood fiber, some states, such as Pennsylvania, have released guidelines for both their state and private forestland, and Maine, Michigan, and Wisconsin plan to publish guidelines later this year. | Steve Wilent | 2008 | Etats-Unis | Article | |
| Revised Assessment of Biomass Harvesting Guidelines | Intensification of biomass utilization, particularly for energy and fuel needs, presents a range of potential e nvironmental risks. This report provides a review of guidelines put forth by states and ot her entities to avoid these environmental risks and promote the ecological sustainability of forest biomass utilization. | Alexander M. Evans, Robert T. Perschel et Brian A.Kittler | 2010 | Monde | Rapport | |
| Protecting Minnesota’s Forests While Utilizing Biomass Resources. An overview of the Minnesota Forest Resources Council’s Forest Biomass Harvesting Guidelines | Guidelines Key Considerations to maintain and enhance the resiliency of Minnesota’s public and private forests. | Anonyme | 2012 | Etats-Unis | fiche d'information | |
| Protecting the Environment during Mechanised Harvesting Operations | Best practice can minimise the risk of environmental damage during harvesting operations on soft ground. This may increase operational costs but can be justified by the need to protect soils and prevent erosion and subsequent siltation within watercourses. The selection of preventive rather than ‘first aid’ methods should be encouraged. | Ian Murgatroyd et Colin Saunders | 2005 | Royaume-Uni | Synthèse | |
| Managing Brash on Conifer Clearfell Sites | This Practice Note gives guidance on the range of available options for brash management, and the possible consequences of each option. | Andy Moffat, Bill M Jones et Bill Mason | 2006 | Royaume-Uni | Synthèse | |
| Biomass Harvesting Guidelines for Forestlands, Brushlands and Open Lands | These guidelines focus on how to protect the functions and values of forest resources during woody biomass harvesting management activities. They generally do not provide advice on whether to manage or which management activities are needed. These guidelines do, however, recommend avoiding or modifying biomass harvest of some sites of statewide ecological significance or ecological sensitivity. | anonyme | 2007 | Etats-Unis | Rapport | |
| Water quality protection in bioenergy production: the US system of forestry Best Management Practices | United States federal law requires that states operate programs to address non-point source pollution. Forestry non-point source programs vary among states in their approach. Some states have laws that prescribe mandatory practices to control pollution, whereas other states use voluntary approaches of Best Management Practices (BMPs) and education and outreach programs. States routinely monitor the extent of BMP implementation so as to improve educational programs and thus improve implementation. Many states also have conducted studies to assess whether BMPs are effective in protecting water quality. A growing body of literature strongly suggests that properly implemented BMPs do protect water quality. | James P. Shepard | 2006 | Etats-Unis | Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 30, Issue 4, pp. 378-384 | Article |
| Forestry best management practise guidelines for water quality management in Oklahoma | Forestry Best Management Practice Guidelines, or BMPs, are proposed in this document as (1) a supplement to the technical BMPs on for est practices and road construction now contained in the State Water Quality M anagement Plan, and (2) for current use by forest owners and operators and by state a gencies for BMP implementation. | Anonyme | 1991 --> 2008 | Etats-Unis | Article --> Guide | |
| Sylviculture et cours d'eau. Guide des bonnes pratiiques | Ce guide de bonnes pratiques est destiné à l’ensemble des gestionnaires de la forêt (propriétaires, entrepreneurs, exploitants...) et des milieux aquatiques (techniciens rivières...). Tout d’abord, il souligne le rôle positif de la forêt pour la ressource en eau, les milieux naturels et l’homme. Ensuite, il décrit les milieux aquatiques, leur intérêt et les possibles causes et conséquences de leur dégradation par l’activité sylvicole. Puis, il propose, pour chaque étape sylvicole, des solutions techniques permettant de préserver les milieux et de poursuivre l’exploitation forestière. En parallèle, il fait un rappel de la réglementation en vigueur. Enfin, il identifie tous les acteurs du territoire que les gestionnaires peuvent solliciter. | Séverine Ecuvillon et Vincent Mennessier, Groupe de travail sylviculture et milieux aquatiques | 2014 | France | Rapport | |
| A review of best management practices for forest watershe biomass harvests with an emphasis on recommandations for leaving residual wood onside | One assignment resulting from the workshop was a review of best management practices (BMPs) de veloped by states to address biomass harvesting. A specific focus was whether or not the stat es recommended leaving residual wood onsite for habitat, soil, and water conservation. Upon review, we found that many st ates are adopting state biomass harvesting guidelines (SBHGs) and, furtherm ore, that there are already reviews of these emerging, focused BMPs. | George Ice, Matt McBroom, Stephen F. Austin, Peter Schweitzer | 2010 | Etats-Unis | Rapport | |
| Forestry and Water Quality Guidlines | The guidelines describe a range of measures intended to cover all situations relating to forestry and water quality. Not all of the measures outlined will be applicable to every site. However, it is the responsibility of forest owners to identify and apply those measures which are appropriate to their particular forest. | Anonyme | 2000 | Royaume-Uni | Rapport | |
| Recommendations for logging residues harvesting and ash recycling | The following recommendations specify how the Swedish Forest Agency believes extraction of harvesting residues (mainly branch es and tree tops) and ash recycling should be done to avoid negative effects on biological diversity or on contents of nutrients, acids or harmful substances in the soil or runoff water. | Swedish Forest Agency | 2008 | Suède | Rapport | |
| Whole-tree Clearcutting in New England: Manager's. Guide to Impact on Soils, Streams, and Regeneration | Intensively harvested forests in New England have shifted partially from conventional stem-only clearcutting using chainsaws and skidders to whole-tree clearcutting using harvesting machines. We have studied the impacts of whole- tree clearcutting on soil, water, and revegetation in spruce-fir, northern hardwood, and central hardwood forest types. This report summarizes the relevance of our findings to forest management and suggests various management considerations, guidelines, and further readings. The intended audience consists of practicing foresters, land managers, environmental protection agencies and organizations, and the general public. | Robert S. Pierce et al. | 1993 | Etats-Unis | Rapport | |
| La récolte raisonnée des rémanents en forêt | Dans la perspective d'une diversification des sources d'énergie, les résidus d'exploitation (branches et feuillages) couramment appelés rémanents constituent une ressource intéressante jusqu'alors peu valorisée. Toutefois, la récolte répétée de ces produits n'est pas neutre et peut représenter une exportation d'éléments minéraux non négligeable. Elle peut entraîner, sur certains types de sols, une baisse de la fertilité à long terme, à prohiber dans le cadre d'une sylviculture durable sans apport externe. À partir de quels taux de récolte et sur quels types de sols ? Ce guide tente d'y répondre en faisant la synthèse des recherches de l'INRA sur les cycles biogéochimiques et en s'appuyant sur l'évaluation de quelques chantiers de récolte suivis par l'UCFF et l'AFOCEL. | Emmanuel Cacot (coord.) Nicolas Eisner, François Charnet, Pascal Leon, Croline Rantien , Jacques Ranger | 2006 | France | Synthèse | |
| Pour une exploitation forestière respectueuse des sols et de la forêt "PROSOL" | Nous posons dans ce guide technique, d’une part les fondamentaux concernant le sol forestier et les raisons de sa nécessaire prise en compte dans les actes de gestion, et d’autre part les systèmes d’exploitation avec les machines et accessoires utilisés aujourd’hui en France. Il donnera à l’ensemble des acteurs concernés - propriétaires, gestionnaires, entreprises de travaux, sociétés d’exploitation forestière, ouvriers forestiers - les informations nécessaires à un meilleur discernement des enjeux de chacun. Ce guide propose ainsi un diagnostic innovant pour déterminer la sensibilité du sol au tassement et optimiser le choix du système de récolte. Il en découlera une meilleure organisation de la circulation des machines en forêt. | Didier Pischedda (coord.) Michel Bartoli, Alain Brèthes, Emmanuel Cacot, Jean-Luc Chagnon, Xavrier Gauquelin, Manuel Nicolas, Didier Pischedda, Claudine Richter | 2009 | France | Rapport | |
| An integrated approach to assess sustainable forest biomass potentials at country level (chapter 6) | Nutrient sustainability in context of whole - tree harvesting appeared to be an important constraint when considering how much biomass is realisable from fo rests. The attitude of private forest owners towards increased harvest of forest biomass is also of major importance for the realisable potential, given the small - scale structure of forest ownership in Austria. | Michael Englisch, Thomas Gschwantner, Thomas Ledermann and Klaus Katzensteiner | 2017 | Autriche | Livre | |
| Elaboration d'une grille d'évaluation multifonctionnelle des chantiers forestiers Bois-energie | Soucieuses de « produire plus de bois en préservant mieux la biodiversité » ou de « dynamiser la filière -bois en protégeant la biodiversité ordinaire et remarquable », dialectique exprimée par le Grenelle de l’Environnement, les collectivités publiques souhaitent aujourd’hui avoir un retour sur les impacts sociaux et environnementaux de leur politique d’encouragement de la filière bois énergie. Dans cet objectif, le présent travail propose une grille d’évaluation multifonctionnelle des chantiers forestiers produisant au moins pour partie du bois énergie. | Florian Le Meur, Marc Fuhr, Emmanuel Cacot | 2011 | France | Rapport | |
| A Review of Biomass Harvesting Best Management Practices Guidelines North East State Foresters Association | The North East State Foresters Association (NEFA) conducted a thorough review of all the biomass harvesting guidelines that have been developed at the state level in the U.S., in other countries, and also within the existing forest certification systems. Many states have some form of harvesting guidelines for protection of water quality (Best Management Practices or BMPs), but these do not usually cover biomass harvesting explicitly. Therefore, standard BMPs are not covered in this review. It is evident that peer reviewed scientific research forms the basis of the biomass harvesting guidelines that have been published to date, but only to a limit. The science has revealed areas where biomass harvesting must be conducted judiciously due to the fragile nature of the resource, but the research rarely provides a sure-bet metric to guide field harvesting activities. | 2012 | ||||
| Guide de recommandations d'exploitation des menus bois en Franche Comté | Répondant à une attente des propriétaires et des gestionnaires forestiers, l’objectif de ce guide est d’apporter des conseils afin de raisonner la récolte des menus bois. Toutes les informations contenues dans chacune des fiches se concluent par des conseils de gestion donnés aux propriétaires. | Anonyme | 2014 | France | Rapport | |
| Le bois-énergie en Franche-Comté. Guide au positionnement et à l'action des associations. | Dans un contexte de développement de l’utilisation du bois-énergie en Franche-Comté, il nous a paru important de produire un document, destiné au réseau associatif franc-comtois investi dans la protection de l’environnement, permettant de situer les enjeux liés à l’utilisation du bois-énergie et de mettre en avant des propositions concrètes afin que la ressource en bois et la biodiversité forestière soient préservés sur notre territoire. | Anonyme | 2014 | France | Rapport | |
| Bois-energie et biodiversité forestière | Ce travail dresse dans un premier temps un état des lieux des forêts et de leur biodiversité en France. Puis il développe les différentes sources et techniques utilisées pour récolter et développer le bois-énergie. La dernière partie de ce travail est consacrée aux impacts potentiels sur la biodiversité que le Comité français de l'UICN recommande de prendre en compte dans le cadre du développement du bois-énergie. | Marie Monmousseau | 2015 | France | Rapport | |
| Sustainable Woodfuel Harvesting. Finnish Practical Applications | The aim of this publication is to present basic principles and practical guidelines on how to ensure the sustainability of woodfuel harvesting operations in boreal forests. The guidelines are described on a relatively general level, so that they are more or less straightforwardly applicable to other European conditions. Since the EU 27 consists of such a diverse range of forest ecosystems, more detailed instructions suitable to particular circumstances should be established by national or regional institutions. | Martti Kuusinen | 2010 | Europe | Rapport | |
| Chief Forester Guidance on Coarse Woody Debris Management | This document provides guidance for managing coarse woody debris on Crown forest land in British Columbia. The guidance is intended to inform resource professionals and is not binding on licensees or practitioners. | Anonyme | 2010 | Canada | Rapport | |
| Maintaining soil productivity in forest biomass chipping operations best management practices for soil conservation | Forest harvesting operations that use portable chipping systems to generate biomass chips from logging residue are currently in use in British Columbia. Leaving deposits of residual materials after harvest has been completed can reduce productivity and affect soil hydrologic function. We summarize the research on the effects of chipped woody material accumulations, and then interpret these findings within the British Columbia context and provide guidance for best management practices to maintain long-term site productivity. | R., Kabzems, S. Dube, M. Curran, B. Chapman, S. Berch, G. Hope, M. Kranabetter, and C. Bulmer | 2011 | Canada | Article | |
| Alberta timber harvest planning and operating ground rules framework for renewal | The Timber Harvest Planning and Operating Ground Rules provide direction to forest companies and government for planning, implementing and monitoring timber harvesting operations on timber disposition areas in Alberta. | Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development Forest Division Forest Management Branch - | 2012 | Canada | Rapport | |
| La récolte de biomasse forestière : saines pratiques et enjeux écologiques dans la forêt boréale canadienne | De nombreuses recherches portent actuellement sur les différents aspects de la mise en œuvre de la récolte de biomasse forestière dans les forêts boréales (techniques de récolte, équipement, transformation, produits, etc.). L’étude des impacts environnementaux du prélèvement des résidus forestiers est dorénavant, au même titre que les aspects plus techniques, au cœur des préoccupations des chercheurs, mais aussi de différentes juridictions qui ont à composer avec cette nouvelle pratique qui constitue un nouvel intrant sur le plan économique. | Evelyne Thiffault, Amélie St-Laurent Samuel, Rut Serra | 2015 | Canada | Rapport | |
| Normes de gestion pour favoriser la biodiversité dans les bois soumis au régime forestier | Le but de ce document est de détailler et de préciser les mesures spécifiques en faveur du développement de la biodiversité forestière prévues au chapitre 5 (4.2) de la circulaire n° .2619 relative aux aménagements dans les bois soumis au régime forestier. | Etienne Branquart, Sandrine liégeois | 2012 | Belgique | Rapport | |
| A Compilation of Forest Biomass Harvesting and Related Policy in Canada | The main objective of this literature review is to summarize policies, includ- ing legislation, regulations and guidelines, related to the harvest of woody forest biomass in Canada. Discussion related to other aspects of forest biomass harvesting (e.g., economics, logistics, and ecological implications) is minimal in this paper since there are other many other excellent references on these topics. | Jean Roach, Shannon M. Berch | 2014 | Canada | Rapport | |
| Increased biomass harvesting for bioenergy. Effects on biodiversity, landscape amenities and cultural heritage values | Bioenergy is one important form of renewable energy where Finland, Norway and Sweden have considerable potential. Greatly increased use of biomass for energy will, however, have considerable effects on environmental values like biodiversity, landscape appearance, outdoor recreation, and the cultural heritage. This review concludes that positive or marginally negative effects of biomass harvesting are likely for harvesting of logging residues, clearance of trees under power lines, along roads, and from marginal agricultural land, as well as production of energy crops on arable land. Negative effects are likely from harvesting of stumps, more intensive forest cultivation on logged areas, and harvesting of biomass from currently non-commercial forests. The environmental effects of production of biomass from reed canary grass or short rotation forestry will depend on where and how such production takes place. | Håkan Berglund, Erik Framstad, Vegard Gundersen, Raimo Heikkilä, Noora Lankinen, Taru Peltola, Ole Risbøl, Martin Weih | 2009 | Pays baltes et scandinaves | Livre | |
| Stump Harvesting for Bioenergy – A Review of the Environmental Impacts | Stump harvesting signifi es an intensification of forest management compared with conventional stem-only or above- ground biomass-only harvesting. There are many practical and perceived benefi ts of stump harvesting. These include (1) the production of woodfuel (2) fossil fuel substitution (3) additional revenue for forest owners (4) improved site preparation and (5) potential reduction of Heterobasidion . However, evidence suggests that, in the absence of appropriate precautionary measures, stump harvesting will lead to many undesirable environmental impacts. | J.D. Walmsley and D.L. Godbold | 2010 | Royaume-Uni | Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, Volume 83, Issue 1, January 2010, Pages 17–38 | Article scientifique |
| Consequences of More Intensive Forestry for the Sustainable Management of Forest Soils and Waters | Here, we review and discuss some of the most pertinent questions related to how increased forest biomass production in Sweden could affect soils and surface waters, and how contemporary forestry goals can be met while minimizing the loss of other ecosystem services. We suggest that the development of management plans to promote the sustainable use of soil resources and water quality, while maximizing biomass production, will require a holistic ecosystem approach that is placed within a broader landscape perspective. | Hjalmar Laudon, Ryan A. Sponseller, Richard W. Lucas, Martyn N. Futter, Gustaf Egnell, Kevin Bishop, Anneli Ågren, Eva Ring and Peter Högberg | 2011 | Pays baltes et scandinaves | Forests 2011, 2(1), 243-260 | Article scientifique |
| Tools to Minimize the Impacts of Energy Wood Harvesting on the Environment and Soil Productivity in Minnesota | This report is one of several being prepared as part of an international effort to enhance the understanding of the status and relevant issues associated with woody biomass harvesting, as well as methods to minimize adverse biomass harvesting impacts on the environm ent and, notably, soil productivity. | Anna L. Robertson, Michael A. Kilgore et Alan R. Ek | 2008 | Etats-Unis | Rapport | |
| Review of recommendations for forest energy harvesting and wood ash recycling: chapter 7 | The existing recommendations and information materials cover a wide range of topics including economic, ecological, environmental, social, technical and practical aspects for the whole forest fuel chain, ranging from available and potential resources, silviculture and production in the forest, harvesting technology, processing, handling, storage and transport to fuel quality, combustion technology, and emissions from the energy plant. In addition, waste production, wood ash recycling to the forest and institutional and participatory aspects are covered (Stupak et al. 2007). | Inge Stupak, Antti Asikainen, Dominik Röser et Karri Pasanen | 2008 | Pays baltes et scandinaves | Livre | |
| Effects on biodiversity of forest fuel extraction, governed by processes working on a large scale | The question whether forest fuel extraction will affect biodiversity is ultimately a question of whether there will be species extinctions due to this practice. Quantitative predictions, i.e. about how much habitat loss various species can tolerate, therefore require knowledge about processes that work over hundreds of square kilometres and over several years. Therefore, they are almost impossible to make. Instead, qualitative recommendations about which types of habitats or wood types that have the most threatened fauna and flora can be made based on information about landscape history and microhabitat associations of red-listed species. For Sweden a general conclusion for forest fuel extraction based mainly on saproxylic beetles is that coniferous wood can be harvested as forest fuel to a rather large extent, whereas deciduous tree species, and especially southern deciduous species and aspen, should be retained to a larger degree. | M. Jonsell | 2007 | Pays baltes et scandinaves | Acte de colloque | |
| Potential posivite and negative environemental impacts of increased woody biomass use for California | This report reviews the published literature relevant to the potential environmental impacts of increased woody biomass use for energy generation in California and identifies information gaps that exist in understanding those impacts. | William Stewart, Robert F. Powers, Kathyrn McGown, Lindsay Chiono, Teresa Chuang | 2011 | Etats-Unis | Rapport | |
| Intensive forest biomass harvesting and biodiversity in Canada: A summary of relevant issues | In this paper, we summarized the biodiversity-focused content of the workshop, including potential implications of intensification of biomass removal on biodiversity, knowledge gaps identified by workshop participants, and implications for policy development. Woody debris represents an important habitat resource for a wide variety of forest organisms, and the presence and continued supply of fresh to highly decayed dead wood represents a key concern in managed forest systems. | Shannon M. Berch, Dave Morris, Jay Malcolm | 2011 | Canada | Article scientifique | |
| Effects of fuelwood on biodiversity - a review focused on the situation in Europe | La demande d’énergie sans cesse croissante et les préoccupations au sujet des changements climatiques, des émissions de gaz à effet de serre et du pic pétrolier ont incité les pays à élaborer des politiques qui favorisent les énergies renouvelables, incluant la bioénergie basée sur la forêt. En Europe, les changements en foresterie motivés par la production de bois de chauffage vont sans doute avoir un impact sur les conditions de l’habitat pour la biodiversité forestière. Nous avons fait une revue systématique de la littérature, basée sur 88 articles, pour faire la synthèse des résultats de la recherche et des lacunes dans l’état de nos connaissances | Christophe Bouet, Aurore Lassauce, Mats Jonsell | 2012 | Europe | Article scientifique | |
| Biomass Harvesting and Soil Productivity: Is the Science Meeting our Policy Needs? | Biomass harvesting and associated management practices increase the availability of forest-based feedstocks for emerging bioproduct and energy markets. Concerns about the sustainability of these practices have led to the development of biomass harvesting guidelines (BHGs) by state, national, and international agencies and nongovernmental organizations. Site productivity BHG provisions include retaining specific proportions of harvested residues and restricting biomass harvesting on some sites. | Eric D. Vance, W. Michael Aust, Brian D. Strahm, Robert E. Froese Robert B. Harrison, Larry A. Morris | 2014 | Etats-Unis | Acte de colloque | |
| Projet Resobio. Gestion des rémanents forestiers : préservation des sols et de la biodiversité | Le projet RESOBIO – « Gestion des Rémanents forestiers : préservation des sols et de la biodiversité », soutenu par l’ADEME et le Ministère en charge de l’agriculture, de l’agroalimentaire et de la forêt, a pour double objectif (i) d’actualiser les connaissances disponibles au niveau international – avec un focus sur les zones tempérées – sur les conséquences potentielles du prélèvement des rémanents forestiers dans le domaine de la fertilité et de la biodiversité et (ii) d’identifier les pistes de recommandations pour une révision du guide de l’ADEME (2006) sur la « récolte raisonnée des rémanents en forêt ». Le thème de la biodiversité n’était pas couvert par ce guide. | Landmann et al | 2014 | Monde | Rapport | |
| Gestion des rémanents forestiers : préservation des sols et de la biodiversité. Synthèse de l'étude Resobio | la présente synthèse résume les résultats de ce tra vail sur (i) la nature des bois utilisés (et parmi eux les rémanents) pour la production d’énergie, (i i) les conséquences de ce type de prélèvement pour la fertilité des sols (y compris les possibilités de fertilisation compensatoire, notamment par les cendres de bois), et (iii) les conséquences pou r la biodiversité. | Landmann et al | 2015 | Monde | Rapport | |
| Quantifying consequences of removing harvesting residues on forest soils and tree growth – A meta-analysis | The main objective of the present study was to compile published data worldwide and to quantify the overall effects of removing harvesting residues on nutrient outputs, chemical and biological soil fertility and tree growth, through a meta-analysis. Our study showed that, compared with conventional stem-only harvest, removing the stem plus the harvesting residues generally increases nutrient outputs thereby leading to reduced amounts of total and available nutrients in soils and soil acidification, particularly when foliage is harvested along with the branches. | David Achat, Christine Deleuze, Guy Landmann, Noémie Pousse, Jacques Ranger, Laurent Augusto | 2015 | France | Forest Ecology and Management | Article scientifique |
| Potential ecological consequences of biomass harvesting in California | The expansion of forest biomass markets may affect California’s forests both positively and negatively. Existing research does not permit an exact assessment of biomass harvesting impact in each forest type, but policy decisions can still benefit from a synthesis of the available science. Biomass markets may permit the harvest and removal of trees that would previously have been left in the woods to die, so they may reduce the prevalence of key habitat elements such as snags and downed logs. Water quality, soils, and site productivity can also be affected by reductions in dead wood brought about by increased biomass harvesting. | Alexander M. Evans | 2015 | Etats-Unis | Journal of Sustainable Forestry | Article scientifique |
| Sustainable Criteria and Indicators for Solid Bioenergy from Forests | This outcome paper aims to bring together and summarize ideas expressed by the participants in the Joint Workshops in order to propose a set of criteria and indicators for solid bioenergy from forests. Both the most relevant scientific literature and the state-of-the-art at different levels (forestry perspective, various certification schemes and countries initiatives) were considered in order to develop this proposal. | Uwe R. Fritsche, Leire Iriarte, Johnny de Jong, Elke van Thuijl, Emma Lammers, Alessandro Agostini, Nicolae Scarlat | 2012 | Europe | Rapport | |
| Principles of nutrient managementfor sustainable forest bioenergyproduction | Nutrient management is an important part of ensuring sustainable forest produc-tion. Essential concepts for managing site nutrients are built on the knowledge oftypes of soil, tree nutrient demands, and how these are impacted by silviculture,harvesting, and other management practices. Managers must clearly define forestmanagement objectives, and how bioenergy production or carbon dioxide-offsetobjectives require special consideration. Managers must examine how silviculture, harvesting, and other management practices might affect nutrient poolsand availability. Soil fertility management practices are designed in response tothese evaluation steps. Fertility management alternatives may include alteringmanagement practices that affect the distribution of harvested tree branches, fo-liage, and tops, as well as addition of fertilizers, nitrogen-fixing plants, or woodash. Planting on sites with pre-existing nutrient deficiencies may require addingnutrients to obtain merchantable tree growth over the short and long term. Nu-trient management principles may also be required to minimize off-site impactsof management practices, for example, on water quality or climate change. Man-agers must determine what nutrients are needed on forested sites, amendmentrates, and timing, and take into account the relationships among nutrients, soil,climate, and plant processes throughout the rotation. Soil and foliar analysis andthe use of soil and plant bioassay tools can assist in these evaluations. Sustainablemanagement practices require that nutrient control strategies evaluate economicand energy balances, and if necessary, modify management practices, includingnutrient amendments, to ensure that they are sustainable. Examples of forestnutrient management practices are described.C | D. Mead, C. Smith | 2012 | Europe | Article | |
| Guide pratique pour la Gestion durable des forêts certifiées PEFC en région Wallonne | Ce guide d’aide à la mise en œuvre de la charte s’adresse à tous les propriétaires et gestionnaires forestiers qui ont signé la charte pefc pour une gestion durable des forêts il a pour objectif d’expliciter de manière plus précise le contenu des engagements de la charte et de suggérer quelques pistes de réflexion pour valoriser nos forêts conformément aux principes de gestion durable. Ce guide est également riche en références bibliographiques et en sites internet qui permettront aux utilisateurs de ce guide de trouver un complément d’information à leurs questions. | Anonyme | 2007 | Belgique | Rapport | |
| Annexe 6 : Cahier des charges national pour le propriétaire forestier | Ce document définit les exigences nationales PEFC s’appliquant au propriétaire forestier en France. Il est le résultat d’une réflexion nationale associant tous les acteurs impliqués dans la filière forêt-bois. Il est assorti d’un programme d’accompagnement mis en œuvre par l’entité d’accès à la certification PEFC (EAC) dont le propriétaire adhérent dépend territorialement, et visant à aider les propriétaires dans l’application des engagements énoncés ci-dessous. | Anonyme | 2012 | France | Rapport | |
| Certification of Forest Fuel Production Systems: a Solution for Sustainable Use of Biomass from Forest Residues for Energy | This paper offers a preliminary analysis of criteria to incorporate in a certification procedure for forest energy, a procedure that may remove some of the barriers that prevent increased use of biomass for energy in many regions of the world today. | J. Richardson, R. Björheden et C.T. Smith | 2005 | Irlande | Rapport | |
| Sustainable utilisation of forest biomass for energy—Possibilities and problems: Policy, legislation, certification, and recommendations and guidelines in the Nordic, Baltic, and other European countries | The substitution of biomass for fossil fuels in energy consumption is a measure to mitigate global warming, as well as having other advantages. Political action plans for increased use exist at both European and national levels. This paper briefly reviews the contents of recommendations, guidelines, and other synthesis publications on sustainable use of forest biomass for energy. Topics are listed and an overview of advantages, disadvantages, and trade-offs between them is given, from the viewpoint of society in general and the forestry and energy sectors in particular. For the Nordic and Baltic countries, the paper also identifies the extent to which wood for energy is included in forest legislation and forest certification standards under the “Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification” (PEFC) and the “Forest Stewardship Council” (FSC) schemes. | I. Stupak, A. Asikainen, , M. Jonsell, E. Karltun, , A. Lunnan, D. Mizaraitė, K. Pasanen, , H. Pärng, , K. Raulund-Rasmussen, D. Röser, , M. Schroeder, , I. Varnagirytė, , L. Vilkriste, , I. Callesen, i, N. Clarke, , T. Gaitnieks, M. Ingerslev, , M. Mandre, , R. Ozolincius , A. Saarsalmi, , K. Armolaitis, H.-S. Helmisaari, , A. Indriksons, , L. Kairiukstis, , K. Katzensteiner, , M. Kukkola, K. Ots, H.P. Ravn, P. Tamminen - | 2007 | Europe | Biomass and Bioenergy (Vol. 31, Issue 10, pp. 666-684) | Article scientifique |
| Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest fuel production and harvesting: A review of current standards for sustainable forest management | International processes and certification systems have been developed to ensure sustainable forest management (SFM) in general, but it is important to consider if they adequately address specific impacts of intensified production and harvesting methods related to forest fuels. To explore how existing SFM frameworks address sustainable forest fuel production, criteria and indicators (C&I) from 10 different international processes and organizations and 157 international, national and sub-national forest management certification standards under the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) and the Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC) were reviewed. International processes include indicators that require identification or reporting of availability, harvested amounts, value, or share in energy consumption of forest fuels. Forest certification standards address several specific woodfuel issues, but not always in a consistent manner. | Inge Stupak, Brenna Lattimore, Brian D. Titus, C. Tattersall Smith | 2011 | Biomass and Bioenergy (Vol. 35, Issue 8, pp. 3287-3308) | Article scientifique | |
| Overview of recent developments in sustainable biomass certification | The objective of this paper is to give a comprehensive review of initiatives on biomass certification from different viewpoints of stakeholders, including national governments (such as The Netherlands, the UK, Belgium and Germany), the EC, NGOs, companies, and international bodies up until October 2007. Furthermore, opportunities and restrictions in the development of biomass certification are described, including international trade law limitations, lack of adequate methodologies, stakeholder involvement requirements and certification costs. | Jinke van Dam, Martin Junginger, André Faaij, Ingmar Jürgens, Gustavo Best, Uwe Fritsche | 2008 | Europe | Biomass and Bioenergy (Vol. 32, Issue 8, pp. 749-780) | Article scientifique |
| Provincial Government Standards, Criteria, and Indicators for Sustainable Harvest of Forest Biomass in British Columbia: Soil and Biodiversity | An increasing amount of biomass is being harvested from British Columbia’s forests as a feedstock for bioenergy, and these removals have the potential to incrementally increase machine traffic and organic matter removals from forest sites, compared to harvesting operations focused solely on roundwood for timber or pulp. To the extent that existing standards support SFM, they may be sufficient for ensuring that biomass harvesting is also sustainable. Regardless of the new challenges created by intensive harvesting practices, the principles of soil and biodiversity conservation remain the same. The current framework for BC’s SFM policy is reviewed to examine whether it addresses the major sustainability issues that are likely to arise in the province if intensive biomass harvesting becomes more prevalent. We conclude that intensification of biomass removals will require us to keep focused on stand and landscape sensitivity to coarse woody debris removals and biodiversity requirements, nutrient removals, and cumulative soil disturbance | Shannon M. Berch, Chuck Bulmer, Mike Curran, Maija Finvers, Brian Titus | 2011 | Canada | International Journal of Forest Engineering (Vol. 23, 2012, Issue 1) | Article scientifique |
| Proceedings of the Workshop W6.1 Forest bioenergy and soil sustainability at EUROSOIL Congress 2nd July to 6th July 2012, Bari, Italy | The main product of the Workshop will be a review on national guidelines for sustainable forest bioenergy use for long term soil and forest sustainability. | Heljä-Sisko Helmisaari et Elena Vanguelova | 2013 | Europe | OECD | Actes |